NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook) vs AMD Radeon RX 460 (Laptop)

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook) and AMD Radeon RX 460 (Laptop) videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook)

• Videocard is newer: launch date 5 month(s) later
• Around 37% higher core clock speed: 1493 MHz vs 1090 MHz
• Around 35% higher boost clock speed: 1620 MHz vs 1200 MHz
• Around 18% higher texture fill rate: 77.76 GTexel / s vs 66.08 GTexel / s
• 1130.9x better floating-point performance: 2,488 gflops vs 2.2 TFLOPs
• 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
• Around 38% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 75.758 vs 55
• Around 9% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 5.071 vs 4.656
• Around 27% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 301.168 vs 237.944
• Around 35% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 2340 vs 1730

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 460 (Laptop)

• Around 17% higher pipelines: 896 vs 768
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 16 nm
• Around 7% lower typical power consumption: 70 Watt vs 75 Watt
• 3.1x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 65217 vs 20732
• Around 15% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 970.421 vs 843.503
• 3.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 76.881 vs 24.676

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook)
GPU 2: AMD Radeon RX 460 (Laptop)

Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	20732 65217
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	75.758 55
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	843.503 970.421
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	5.071 4.656
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	24.676 76.881
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	301.168 237.944
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	2340 1730

Compare specifications (specs)