NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook) vs ATI Radeon X1650 XT AGP
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook) and ATI Radeon X1650 XT AGP videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook)
- Videocard is newer: launch date 10 year(s) 3 month(s) later
- 2.8x more core clock speed: 1493 MHz vs 540 MHz
- 18x more texture fill rate: 77.76 GTexel / s vs 4.32 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 16 nm vs 80 nm
- 8x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 512 MB
- 5.2x more memory clock speed: 7008 MHz vs 1360 MHz
Launch date | 1 February 2017 vs 30 October 2006 |
Core clock speed | 1493 MHz vs 540 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 77.76 GTexel / s vs 4.32 GTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 16 nm vs 80 nm |
Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 512 MB |
Memory clock speed | 7008 MHz vs 1360 MHz |
Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon X1650 XT AGP
- Around 36% lower typical power consumption: 55 Watt vs 75 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 55 Watt vs 75 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook)
GPU 2: ATI Radeon X1650 XT AGP
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook) | ATI Radeon X1650 XT AGP |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 5918 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 323 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 20732 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 75.758 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 843.503 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 5.071 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 24.676 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 301.168 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 8496 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3687 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3336 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 8496 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3687 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3336 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2340 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook) | ATI Radeon X1650 XT AGP | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Pascal | R500 |
Code name | GP106B | RV560 |
Launch date | 1 February 2017 | 30 October 2006 |
Place in performance rating | 533 | not rated |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1620 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 1493 MHz | 540 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 2,488 gflops | |
Manufacturing process technology | 16 nm | 80 nm |
Pipelines | 768 | |
Texture fill rate | 77.76 GTexel / s | 4.32 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 55 Watt |
Transistor count | 4,400 million | 330 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video |
G-SYNC support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | AGP 8x |
Laptop size | large | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 9.0c |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 2.0 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 512 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 112.1 GB / s | 21.76 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 7008 MHz | 1360 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR3 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
Multi Monitor | ||
Multi-Projection |