NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 5 GB vs AMD Radeon Pro 580
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 5 GB and AMD Radeon Pro 580 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 5 GB
- Videocard is newer: launch date 6 month(s) later
- Around 37% higher core clock speed: 1506 MHz vs 1100 MHz
- Around 42% higher boost clock speed: 1709 MHz vs 1200 MHz
- Around 25% lower typical power consumption: 120 Watt vs 150 Watt
- Around 18% higher memory clock speed: 8008 MHz vs 6780 MHz
- Around 17% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 9039 vs 7753
- Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 10818 vs 10113
- Around 18% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3417 vs 2900
- Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 10818 vs 10113
- Around 18% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3417 vs 2900
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 26 December 2017 vs 5 June 2017 |
Core clock speed | 1506 MHz vs 1100 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1709 MHz vs 1200 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 120 Watt vs 150 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 8008 MHz vs 6780 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 9039 vs 7753 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 10818 vs 10113 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3417 vs 2900 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 vs 3353 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 10818 vs 10113 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3417 vs 2900 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 vs 3353 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro 580
- Around 41% higher texture fill rate: 193.0 GTexel / s vs 136.7 GTexel / s
- Around 80% higher pipelines: 2304 vs 1280
- Around 41% better floating-point performance: 6,175 gflops vs 4,375 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 16 nm
- Around 60% higher maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 5 GB
- Around 54% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 943 vs 614
- Around 19% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 40070 vs 33562
Specifications (specs) | |
Texture fill rate | 193.0 GTexel / s vs 136.7 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 2304 vs 1280 |
Floating-point performance | 6,175 gflops vs 4,375 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 16 nm |
Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 5 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 943 vs 614 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 40070 vs 33562 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 5 GB
GPU 2: AMD Radeon Pro 580
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 5 GB | AMD Radeon Pro 580 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 9039 | 7753 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 614 | 943 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 33562 | 40070 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 10818 | 10113 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3417 | 2900 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 | 3353 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 10818 | 10113 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3417 | 2900 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 | 3353 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3908 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 109.521 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1206.829 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 9.88 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 117.944 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 511.984 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 5 GB | AMD Radeon Pro 580 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Pascal | GCN 4.0 |
Code name | GP106 | Polaris 20 |
Launch date | 26 December 2017 | 5 June 2017 |
Place in performance rating | 309 | 311 |
Type | Desktop | Workstation |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1709 MHz | 1200 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1506 MHz | 1100 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 4,375 gflops | 6,175 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 16 nm | 14 nm |
Pipelines | 1280 | 2304 |
Texture fill rate | 136.7 GTexel / s | 193.0 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 120 Watt | 150 Watt |
Transistor count | 4,400 million | 5,700 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 250 mm | 241 mm |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | None |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (12_0) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 5 GB | 8 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 160.2 GB / s | 256.0 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 160 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 8008 MHz | 6780 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |