NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop) vs ATI FirePro 2450 Multi-View
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop) and ATI FirePro 2450 Multi-View videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
- Videocard is newer: launch date 7 year(s) 7 month(s) later
- 2.5x more core clock speed: 1506 MHz vs 600 MHz
- 27.8x more texture fill rate: 133.6 GTexel / s vs 4.8 GTexel / s
- 16x more pipelines: 1280 vs 80
- 44.5x better floating-point performance: 4,275 gflops vs 96 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 16 nm vs 55 nm
- 12x more maximum memory size: 6 GB vs 512 MB
- 6.7x more memory clock speed: 8008 MHz vs 1200 MHz
- 160x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 8160 vs 51
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 15 August 2016 vs 1 January 2009 |
| Core clock speed | 1506 MHz vs 600 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 133.6 GTexel / s vs 4.8 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 1280 vs 80 |
| Floating-point performance | 4,275 gflops vs 96 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 16 nm vs 55 nm |
| Maximum memory size | 6 GB vs 512 MB |
| Memory clock speed | 8008 MHz vs 1200 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 8160 vs 51 |
Reasons to consider the ATI FirePro 2450 Multi-View
- 3.8x lower typical power consumption: 32 Watt vs 120 Watt
- Around 9% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 482 vs 444
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 32 Watt vs 120 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 482 vs 444 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
GPU 2: ATI FirePro 2450 Multi-View
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop) | ATI FirePro 2450 Multi-View |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 8160 | 51 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 444 | 482 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 31098 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 111.55 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1371.266 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 8.49 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 19.803 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 509.222 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 12645 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3654 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 12645 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3654 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3677 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop) | ATI FirePro 2450 Multi-View | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Pascal | TeraScale |
| Code name | GP106B | RV620 |
| Launch date | 15 August 2016 | 1 January 2009 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $237.11 | |
| Place in performance rating | 385 | 344 |
| Price now | $229.99 | |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
| Value for money (0-100) | 49.49 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1708 MHz | |
| Core clock speed | 1506 MHz | 600 MHz |
| CUDA cores | 1280 | |
| Floating-point performance | 4,275 gflops | 96 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 16 nm | 55 nm |
| Maximum GPU temperature | 94 °C | |
| Pipelines | 1280 | 80 |
| Texture fill rate | 133.6 GTexel / s | 4.8 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 120 Watt | 32 Watt |
| Transistor count | 4,400 million | 181 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | DP 1.43, HDMI 2.0b, Dual Link-DVI | 1x VHDCI |
| G-SYNC support | ||
| HDCP | ||
| Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Length | 170 mm | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 10.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 3.3 |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | 512 MB |
| Memory bandwidth | 192 GB / s | 38.4 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 192 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 8008 MHz | 1200 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Vision | ||
| Ansel | ||
| CUDA | ||
| DSR | ||
| GameStream | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| Multi Monitor | ||
| Multi-Projection | ||
| ShadowWorks | ||
| Surround | ||
| Virtual Reality | ||
| VR Ready | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop) with others
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop) vs
ATIAll-In-Wonder X1900
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop) vs
ATIFireGL V7700
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop) vs
AMDRadeon HD 6650A
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop) vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1060 3 GB
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop) vs
NVIDIAQuadro P2000
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop) vs
AMDRadeon RX 5300M
