NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop) vs ATI FirePro 2450 Multi-View

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop) and ATI FirePro 2450 Multi-View videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)

• Videocard is newer: launch date 7 year(s) 7 month(s) later
• 2.5x more core clock speed: 1506 MHz vs 600 MHz
• 27.8x more texture fill rate: 133.6 GTexel / s vs 4.8 GTexel / s
• 16x more pipelines: 1280 vs 80
• 44.5x better floating-point performance: 4,275 gflops vs 96 gflops
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 16 nm vs 55 nm
• 12x more maximum memory size: 6 GB vs 512 MB
• 6.7x more memory clock speed: 8008 MHz vs 1200 MHz
• 160x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 8161 vs 51

Reasons to consider the ATI FirePro 2450 Multi-View

• 3.8x lower typical power consumption: 32 Watt vs 120 Watt
• Around 9% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 482 vs 444

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
GPU 2: ATI FirePro 2450 Multi-View

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	8161 51
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	444 482

Compare specifications (specs)