NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop) vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 140 OEM
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop) and NVIDIA GeForce GT 140 OEM videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
- Videocard is newer: launch date 7 year(s) 5 month(s) later
- 2.3x more core clock speed: 1506 MHz vs 650 MHz
- 6.4x more texture fill rate: 133.6 GTexel / s vs 20.8 GTexel / s
- 20x more pipelines: 1280 vs 64
- 20.6x better floating-point performance: 4,275 gflops vs 208 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 16 nm vs 55 nm
- 6x more maximum memory size: 6 GB vs 1 GB
- 4.4x more memory clock speed: 8008 MHz vs 1800 MHz
- 12.4x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 8161 vs 658
- Around 97% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 444 vs 225
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 15 August 2016 vs 10 March 2009 |
Core clock speed | 1506 MHz vs 650 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 133.6 GTexel / s vs 20.8 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 1280 vs 64 |
Floating-point performance | 4,275 gflops vs 208 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 16 nm vs 55 nm |
Maximum memory size | 6 GB vs 1 GB |
Memory clock speed | 8008 MHz vs 1800 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 8161 vs 658 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 444 vs 225 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 140 OEM
- Around 14% lower typical power consumption: 105 Watt vs 120 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 105 Watt vs 120 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 140 OEM
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop) | NVIDIA GeForce GT 140 OEM |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 8161 | 658 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 444 | 225 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 29363 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 111.55 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1371.266 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 8.49 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 19.803 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 509.222 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 12645 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3654 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 12645 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3654 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3666 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop) | NVIDIA GeForce GT 140 OEM | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Pascal | Tesla |
Code name | GP106B | G94B |
Launch date | 15 August 2016 | 10 March 2009 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $237.11 | |
Place in performance rating | 401 | 699 |
Price now | $229.99 | |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Value for money (0-100) | 49.49 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1708 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 1506 MHz | 650 MHz |
CUDA cores | 1280 | |
Floating-point performance | 4,275 gflops | 208 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 16 nm | 55 nm |
Maximum GPU temperature | 94 °C | |
Pipelines | 1280 | 64 |
Texture fill rate | 133.6 GTexel / s | 20.8 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 120 Watt | 105 Watt |
Transistor count | 4,400 million | 505 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | DP 1.43, HDMI 2.0b, Dual Link-DVI | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video |
G-SYNC support | ||
HDCP | ||
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Laptop size | large | |
Length | 229 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 10.0 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 3.3 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | 1 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 192 GB / s | 57.6 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 192 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 8008 MHz | 1800 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR3 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
Ansel | ||
CUDA | ||
DSR | ||
GameStream | ||
GPU Boost | ||
Multi Monitor | ||
Multi-Projection | ||
ShadowWorks | ||
Surround | ||
Virtual Reality | ||
VR Ready |