NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile 6 GB vs AMD Radeon R9 Fury
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile 6 GB and AMD Radeon R9 Fury videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile 6 GB
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 1 month(s) later
- Around 67% higher boost clock speed: 1670 MHz vs 1000 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 16 nm vs 28 nm
- 3.4x lower typical power consumption: 80 Watt vs 275 Watt
- Around 50% higher maximum memory size: 6 GB vs 4 GB
- 16x more memory clock speed: 8008 MHz vs 500 MHz
- Around 19% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 12021 vs 10116
- Around 19% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 12021 vs 10116
- Around 50% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 5569 vs 3717
- Around 50% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 5569 vs 3717
- Around 50% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 5034 vs 3356
- Around 50% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 5034 vs 3356
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 15 August 2016 vs 10 July 2015 |
Boost clock speed | 1670 MHz vs 1000 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 16 nm vs 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 80 Watt vs 275 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 6 GB vs 4 GB |
Memory clock speed | 8008 MHz vs 500 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 12021 vs 10116 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 12021 vs 10116 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 5569 vs 3717 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 5569 vs 3717 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 5034 vs 3356 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 5034 vs 3356 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 Fury
- Around 68% higher texture fill rate: 224.0 GTexel / s vs 133.6 GTexel / s
- 2.8x more pipelines: 3584 vs 1280
- Around 68% better floating-point performance: 7,168 gflops vs 4,275 gflops
Texture fill rate | 224.0 GTexel / s vs 133.6 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 3584 vs 1280 |
Floating-point performance | 7,168 gflops vs 4,275 gflops |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile 6 GB
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 Fury
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile 6 GB | AMD Radeon R9 Fury |
---|---|---|
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 12021 | 10116 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 12021 | 10116 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 5569 | 3717 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 5569 | 3717 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 5034 | 3356 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 5034 | 3356 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 9592 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 796 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 53724 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 140.274 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3595.432 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 13.082 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 132.701 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 789.536 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 4739 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile 6 GB | AMD Radeon R9 Fury | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Pascal | GCN 3.0 |
Code name | GP106 | Fiji |
Launch date | 15 August 2016 | 10 July 2015 |
Place in performance rating | 276 | 277 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Design | AMD Radeon R9 Fury Series | |
Launch price (MSRP) | $549 | |
Price now | $399.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 35.98 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1670 MHz | 1000 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1404 MHz | |
Floating-point performance | 4,275 gflops | 7,168 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 16 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 1280 | 3584 |
Texture fill rate | 133.6 GTexel / s | 224.0 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 80 Watt | 275 Watt |
Transistor count | 4,400 million | 8,900 million |
Compute units | 56 | |
Stream Processors | 3584 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
DisplayPort support | ||
Dual-link DVI support | ||
Eyefinity | ||
HDMI | ||
Number of Eyefinity displays | 6 | |
VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Bridgeless CrossFire | ||
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 8-pin | |
API support |
||
Vulkan | ||
DirectX | 12 | |
Mantle | ||
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.5 | |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | 4 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 192.2 GB / s | 512 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 192 Bit | 4096 bit |
Memory clock speed | 8008 MHz | 500 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | High Bandwidth Memory (HBM) |
High bandwidth memory (HBM) | ||
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
CUDA | ||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
AppAcceleration | ||
CrossFire | ||
DDMA audio | ||
FreeSync | ||
FRTC | ||
HD3D | ||
LiquidVR | ||
PowerTune | ||
TressFX | ||
TrueAudio | ||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) |