NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile 6 GB
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile 6 GB videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 7 month(s) later
- 711.4x more texture fill rate: 95.04 GTexel/s vs 133.6 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 16 nm
- Around 60% lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 80 Watt
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 12180 vs 12021
- Around 60% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8926 vs 5569
- Around 60% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 8062 vs 5034
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 12180 vs 12021
- Around 60% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8926 vs 5569
- Around 60% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 8062 vs 5034
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 2 Apr 2020 vs 15 August 2016 |
Texture fill rate | 95.04 GTexel/s vs 133.6 GTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 16 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt vs 80 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 12180 vs 12021 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8926 vs 5569 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 8062 vs 5034 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 12180 vs 12021 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8926 vs 5569 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 8062 vs 5034 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile 6 GB
- Around 4% higher core clock speed: 1404 MHz vs 1350 MHz
- Around 12% higher boost clock speed: 1670 MHz vs 1485 MHz
- Around 25% higher pipelines: 1280 vs 1024
- Around 50% higher maximum memory size: 6 GB vs 4 GB
- 5.3x more memory clock speed: 8008 MHz vs 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective)
Core clock speed | 1404 MHz vs 1350 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1670 MHz vs 1485 MHz |
Pipelines | 1280 vs 1024 |
Maximum memory size | 6 GB vs 4 GB |
Memory clock speed | 8008 MHz vs 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective) |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile 6 GB
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile 6 GB |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 7569 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 389 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 41946 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 151.899 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1844.67 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 10.683 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 115.919 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 644.054 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 12180 | 12021 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8926 | 5569 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 8062 | 5034 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 12180 | 12021 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8926 | 5569 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 8062 | 5034 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3667 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile 6 GB | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Turing | Pascal |
Code name | TU117 | GP106 |
Launch date | 2 Apr 2020 | 15 August 2016 |
Place in performance rating | 273 | 276 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1485 MHz | 1670 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1350 MHz | 1404 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 16 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 95.04 GFLOPS (1:32) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 6.083 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 3.041 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 1024 | 1280 |
Pixel fill rate | 47.52 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 95.04 GTexel/s | 133.6 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | 80 Watt |
Transistor count | 4700 million | 4,400 million |
Floating-point performance | 4,275 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | |
OpenCL | 1.2 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | |
Shader Model | 6.5 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 6 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 192.0 GB/s | 192.2 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 bit | 192 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective) | 8008 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
CUDA |