NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile 6 GB vs AMD Radeon R9 M390X
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile 6 GB and AMD Radeon R9 M390X videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile 6 GB
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 3 month(s) later
- Around 94% higher core clock speed: 1404 MHz vs 723 MHz
- Around 44% higher texture fill rate: 133.6 GTexel / s vs 92.54 GTexel / s
- Around 44% better floating-point performance: 4,275 gflops vs 2,961 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 16 nm vs 28 nm
- Around 50% higher maximum memory size: 6 GB vs 4 GB
- Around 85% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 12021 vs 6508
- Around 85% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 12021 vs 6508
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 15 August 2016 vs 5 May 2015 |
| Core clock speed | 1404 MHz vs 723 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 133.6 GTexel / s vs 92.54 GTexel / s |
| Floating-point performance | 4,275 gflops vs 2,961 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 16 nm vs 28 nm |
| Maximum memory size | 6 GB vs 4 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 12021 vs 6508 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 12021 vs 6508 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 M390X
- Around 60% higher pipelines: 2048 vs 1280
- Around 7% lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 80 Watt
- Around 54% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8593 vs 5569
- Around 54% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8593 vs 5569
- 4.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 24690 vs 5034
- 4.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 24690 vs 5034
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Pipelines | 2048 vs 1280 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt vs 80 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8593 vs 5569 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8593 vs 5569 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 24690 vs 5034 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 24690 vs 5034 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile 6 GB
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 M390X
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile 6 GB | AMD Radeon R9 M390X |
|---|---|---|
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 12021 | 6508 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 12021 | 6508 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 5569 | 8593 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 5569 | 8593 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 5034 | 24690 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 5034 | 24690 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3597 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 435 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 22044 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 64.199 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1284.053 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 5.881 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 78.169 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 312.822 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile 6 GB | AMD Radeon R9 M390X | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Pascal | GCN 3.0 |
| Code name | GP106 | Amethyst |
| Launch date | 15 August 2016 | 5 May 2015 |
| Place in performance rating | 276 | 304 |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
| Design | AMD Radeon R9 300 Series | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1670 MHz | |
| Core clock speed | 1404 MHz | 723 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 4,275 gflops | 2,961 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 16 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 1280 | 2048 |
| Texture fill rate | 133.6 GTexel / s | 92.54 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 80 Watt | 75 Watt |
| Transistor count | 4,400 million | 5,000 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Eyefinity | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
| Vulkan | ||
| DirectX | 12 | |
| Mantle | ||
| OpenCL | Not Listed | |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 192.2 GB / s | 160.0 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 192 Bit | 256 bit |
| Memory clock speed | 8008 MHz | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| CUDA | ||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| DualGraphics | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| HD3D | ||
| PowerTune | ||
| Switchable graphics | ||
| ZeroCore | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile 6 GB with others
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1060 Mobile 6 GB vs
AMDRadeon R9 390X
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1060 Mobile 6 GB vs
AMDRadeon R9 Fury
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1060 Mobile 6 GB vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1070 (Desktop)
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1060 Mobile 6 GB vs
NVIDIAQuadro P4000
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1060 Mobile 6 GB vs
AMDRadeon RX 560X Mobile
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1060 Mobile 6 GB vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1650 Ti
