NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop) vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Desktop)
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop) and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Desktop) videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 month(s) later
- Around 4% higher texture fill rate: 210.6 GTexel / s vs 202.0 GTexel / s
- Around 7% higher pipelines: 2048 vs 1920
- Around 4% better floating-point performance: 6,738 gflops vs 6,463 gflops
- 5.2x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 5536 vs 1063
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 15 August 2016 vs 10 June 2016 |
Texture fill rate | 210.6 GTexel / s vs 202.0 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 2048 vs 1920 |
Floating-point performance | 6,738 gflops vs 6,463 gflops |
Benchmarks | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 5536 vs 1063 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Desktop)
- Around 2% higher boost clock speed: 1683 MHz vs 1645 MHz
- Around 29% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 13509 vs 10465
- Around 40% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 847 vs 603
Specifications (specs) | |
Boost clock speed | 1683 MHz vs 1645 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 13509 vs 10465 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 847 vs 603 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Desktop)
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop) | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Desktop) |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 10465 | 13509 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 603 | 847 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 47422 | 47422 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 150.951 | 150.951 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1718.593 | 1718.593 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 12.283 | 12.283 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 28.289 | 28.289 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 710.366 | 710.366 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 13765 | 13765 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3691 | 3691 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3340 | 3340 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 13765 | 13765 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3691 | 3691 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3340 | 3340 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 5536 | 1063 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop) | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Desktop) | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Pascal | Pascal |
Code name | GP104B | GP104 |
Launch date | 15 August 2016 | 10 June 2016 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $389.99 | $379 |
Place in performance rating | 296 | 293 |
Price now | $359.99 | $359.99 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Value for money (0-100) | 43.18 | 45.72 |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1645 MHz | 1683 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1506 MHz | 1506 MHz |
CUDA cores | 1920 | 1920 |
Floating-point performance | 6,738 gflops | 6,463 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 16 nm | 16 nm |
Maximum GPU temperature | 94 °C | 94 °C |
Pipelines | 2048 | 1920 |
Texture fill rate | 210.6 GTexel / s | 202.0 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt | 150 Watt |
Transistor count | 7,200 million | 7,200 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | DP 1.42, HDMI 2.0b, Dual Link-DVI | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, DP 1.42, HDMI 2.0b, Dual Link-DVI |
G-SYNC support | ||
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Laptop size | large | |
Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
Length | 10.5" (26.7 cm) | |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 500 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | 8-pin | |
Width | 2-slot | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 8 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 256 GB / s | 256 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 8 GB/s | 8 GB/s |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | 0 |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
Ansel | ||
CUDA | ||
GPU Boost | ||
Multi Monitor | ||
Multi-Projection | ||
ShadowWorks | ||
SLI | ||
Virtual Reality | ||
VR Ready |