NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop) vs NVIDIA Quadro GP100
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop) and NVIDIA Quadro GP100 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop)
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 6 month(s) later
- Around 12% higher core clock speed: 1455 MHz vs 1304 MHz
- Around 10% higher boost clock speed: 1590 MHz vs 1442 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 16 nm
- 8.4x more memory clock speed: 12000 MHz vs 1430 MHz
- Around 14% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 15109 vs 13211
- Around 14% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 15109 vs 13211
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 16828 vs 16640
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 16828 vs 16640
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 23 April 2019 vs 1 October 2016 |
| Core clock speed | 1455 MHz vs 1304 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1590 MHz vs 1442 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 16 nm |
| Memory clock speed | 12000 MHz vs 1430 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 15109 vs 13211 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 15109 vs 13211 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 16828 vs 16640 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 16828 vs 16640 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro GP100
- 2.3x more pipelines: 3584 vs 1536
- 2.7x more maximum memory size: 16 GB vs 6144 MB
- Around 74% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 847 vs 487
- Around 60% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 16374 vs 10205
- 2.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 22133 vs 8054
- 2.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 22133 vs 8054
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Pipelines | 3584 vs 1536 |
| Maximum memory size | 16 GB vs 6144 MB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 847 vs 487 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 16374 vs 10205 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 22133 vs 8054 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 22133 vs 8054 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop)
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro GP100
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop) | NVIDIA Quadro GP100 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 487 | 847 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 10205 | 16374 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 5570 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 15109 | 13211 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 15109 | 13211 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 16828 | 16640 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 16828 | 16640 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 8054 | 22133 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 8054 | 22133 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 84757 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 355.937 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4858.771 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 25.191 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 144.928 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1056.078 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop) | NVIDIA Quadro GP100 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Turing | Pascal |
| Code name | N18E-G0 | GP100 |
| Launch date | 23 April 2019 | 1 October 2016 |
| Place in performance rating | 117 | 87 |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1590 MHz | 1442 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 1455 MHz | 1304 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 16 nm |
| Pipelines | 1536 | 3584 |
| Transistor count | 6600 million | 15,300 million |
| Floating-point performance | 10,329 gflops | |
| Texture fill rate | 322.8 GTexel / s | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 235 Watt | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 4x DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
| Length | 267 mm | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 6144 MB | 16 GB |
| Memory bus width | 192 bit | 4096 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 12000 MHz | 1430 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | HBM2 |
| Memory bandwidth | 921.6 GB / s | |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop) with others
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop) vs
AMDRadeon Pro WX 8200
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop) vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop) vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3080 Max-Q
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop) vs
NVIDIARTX A5000 Mobile
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop) vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3060 Mobile
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop) vs
AppleM2 Ultra 60-core
