NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop) vs AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop) and AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop)

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 8 month(s) later
  • Around 21% higher core clock speed: 1455 MHz vs 1200 MHz
  • Around 4% higher boost clock speed: 1590 MHz vs 1530 MHz
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 14 nm
  • 6x more memory clock speed: 12000 MHz vs 2000 MHz
  • 3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 21281 vs 7164
  • 3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 21281 vs 7164
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 23 April 2019 vs 13 August 2018
Core clock speed 1455 MHz vs 1200 MHz
Boost clock speed 1590 MHz vs 1530 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 12 nm vs 14 nm
Memory clock speed 12000 MHz vs 2000 MHz
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 21281 vs 7164
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 21281 vs 7164

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200

  • Around 49% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 755 vs 507
  • Around 39% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 14137 vs 10176
  • Around 27% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 13044 vs 10235
  • Around 27% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 13044 vs 10235
  • 4.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 30936 vs 7376
  • 4.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 30936 vs 7376
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark 755 vs 507
PassMark - G3D Mark 14137 vs 10176
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 13044 vs 10235
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 13044 vs 10235
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 30936 vs 7376
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 30936 vs 7376

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop)
GPU 2: AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200

PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
507
755
PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
10176
14137
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
21281
7164
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
21281
7164
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
10235
13044
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
10235
13044
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
7376
30936
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
7376
30936
Name NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop) AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200
PassMark - G2D Mark 507 755
PassMark - G3D Mark 10176 14137
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 5587
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 21281 7164
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 21281 7164
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 10235 13044
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 10235 13044
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 7376 30936
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 7376 30936
Geekbench - OpenCL 68523
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 171.616
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 4031.404
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 16.925
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 247.788
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 1195.863

Compare specifications (specs)

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop) AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200

Essentials

Architecture Turing GCN 5.0
Code name N18E-G0 Vega 10
Launch date 23 April 2019 13 August 2018
Place in performance rating 30 16
Type Laptop Workstation
Launch price (MSRP) $999
Price now $999
Value for money (0-100) 13.37

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1590 MHz 1530 MHz
Core clock speed 1455 MHz 1200 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 12 nm 14 nm
Pipelines 1536
Transistor count 6600 million 12,500 million
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 230 Watt

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs 4x mini-DisplayPort

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Laptop size medium sized
Interface PCIe 3.0 x16
Length 267 mm
Supplementary power connectors 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

API support

DirectX 12.1 12.0 (12_1)
OpenGL 4.6

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 6144 MB
Memory bus width 192 bit
Memory clock speed 12000 MHz 2000 MHz
Memory type GDDR6