NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Max-Q vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop)
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Max-Q and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop) videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Max-Q
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 8 month(s) later
- 4x more pipelines: 6144 vs 1536
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 8 nm vs 12 nm
- Around 33% higher maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 6144 MB
- Around 62% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 16500 vs 10205
- Around 32% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 643 vs 487
- Around 55% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 26045 vs 16828
- Around 55% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 26045 vs 16828
- 2.1x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 11904 vs 5570
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 12 Jan 2021 vs 23 April 2019 |
| Pipelines | 6144 vs 1536 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm vs 12 nm |
| Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 6144 MB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 16500 vs 10205 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 643 vs 487 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 26045 vs 16828 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 26045 vs 16828 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 11904 vs 5570 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop)
- Around 87% higher core clock speed: 1455 MHz vs 780 MHz
- Around 28% higher boost clock speed: 1590 MHz vs 1245 MHz
- 8x more memory clock speed: 12000 MHz vs 1500 MHz, 12 Gbps effective
- 4.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 15109 vs 3719
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 8054 vs 3359
- 4.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 15109 vs 3719
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 8054 vs 3359
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1455 MHz vs 780 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1590 MHz vs 1245 MHz |
| Memory clock speed | 12000 MHz vs 1500 MHz, 12 Gbps effective |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 15109 vs 3719 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 8054 vs 3359 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 15109 vs 3719 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 8054 vs 3359 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Max-Q
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop)
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Max-Q | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop) |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 16500 | 10205 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 643 | 487 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 105640 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 26045 | 16828 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3719 | 15109 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 | 8054 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 26045 | 16828 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3719 | 15109 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 | 8054 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 11904 | 5570 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Max-Q | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop) | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Ampere | Turing |
| Code name | GA104 | N18E-G0 |
| Launch date | 12 Jan 2021 | 23 April 2019 |
| Place in performance rating | 119 | 117 |
| Type | Laptop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1245 MHz | 1590 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 780 MHz | 1455 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm | 12 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 239.0 GFLOPS (1:64) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 15.30 TFLOPS (1:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 15.30 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 6144 | 1536 |
| Pixel fill rate | 119.5 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 239.0 GTexel/s | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 80 Watt | |
| Transistor count | 17400 million | 6600 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | Portable Device Dependent | No outputs |
| DisplayPort support | ||
| G-SYNC support | ||
| HDMI | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | |
| Laptop size | large | medium sized |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.1 |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | |
| Shader Model | 6.7 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 6144 MB |
| Memory bandwidth | 384.0 GB/s | |
| Memory bus width | 256 bit | 192 bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1500 MHz, 12 Gbps effective | 12000 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
Technologies |
||
| GPU Boost | ||
| VR Ready | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Max-Q with others
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3080 Max-Q vs
AMDRadeon Pro WX 8200
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3080 Max-Q vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop)
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3080 Max-Q vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3080 Max-Q vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3060 Ti GDDR6X
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3080 Max-Q vs
AppleM1 Max 24-core
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3080 Max-Q vs
AppleM2 Ultra 60-core
