NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop)
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop) videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
- Videocard is newer: launch date 11 month(s) later
- Around 67% higher pipelines: 2560 vs 1536
- Around 33% higher maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 6144 MB
- Around 35% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 13735 vs 10187
- Around 28% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 620 vs 483
- Around 19% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 20002 vs 16828
- Around 26% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 10130 vs 8054
- Around 19% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 20002 vs 16828
- Around 26% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 10130 vs 8054
- Around 32% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 7343 vs 5582
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 2 Apr 2020 vs 23 April 2019 |
| Pipelines | 2560 vs 1536 |
| Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 6144 MB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 13735 vs 10187 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 620 vs 483 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 20002 vs 16828 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 10130 vs 8054 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 20002 vs 16828 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 10130 vs 8054 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 7343 vs 5582 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop)
- Around 56% higher core clock speed: 1455 MHz vs 930 MHz
- Around 47% higher boost clock speed: 1590 MHz vs 1080 MHz
- 8.7x more memory clock speed: 12000 MHz vs 1375 MHz (11000 MHz effective)
- Around 46% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 15109 vs 10384
- Around 46% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 15109 vs 10384
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1455 MHz vs 930 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1590 MHz vs 1080 MHz |
| Memory clock speed | 12000 MHz vs 1375 MHz (11000 MHz effective) |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 15109 vs 10384 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 15109 vs 10384 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop)
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop) |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 13735 | 10187 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 620 | 483 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 76051 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 20002 | 16828 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 10384 | 15109 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 10130 | 8054 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 20002 | 16828 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 10384 | 15109 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 10130 | 8054 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 7343 | 5582 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop) | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Turing | Turing |
| Code name | TU104B | N18E-G0 |
| Launch date | 2 Apr 2020 | 23 April 2019 |
| Place in performance rating | 121 | 124 |
| Type | Laptop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1080 MHz | 1590 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 930 MHz | 1455 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 12 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 172.8 GFLOPS (1:32) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 11.06 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 5.530 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 2560 | 1536 |
| Pixel fill rate | 69.12 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 172.8 GTexel/s | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 80 W | |
| Transistor count | 13600 million | 6600 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Width | IGP | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.1 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | |
| Shader Model | 6.5 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 6144 MB |
| Memory bandwidth | 352.0 GB/s | |
| Memory bus width | 256 bit | 192 bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1375 MHz (11000 MHz effective) | 12000 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q with others
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q vs
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 6000
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop)
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q vs
NVIDIARTX A5000 Mobile
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3060 Mobile
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q vs
AppleM2 Ultra 60-core
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q vs
NVIDIARTX 1000 Mobile Ada Generation
