NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile 6 GB
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile 6 GB videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 6 month(s) later
- Around 9% higher core clock speed: 1530 MHz vs 1404 MHz
- Around 7% higher boost clock speed: 1785 MHz vs 1670 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 16 nm
- Around 25% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 14998 vs 12021
- Around 25% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 14998 vs 12021
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 14 March 2019 vs 15 August 2016 |
| Core clock speed | 1530 MHz vs 1404 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1785 MHz vs 1670 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 16 nm |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 14998 vs 12021 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 14998 vs 12021 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile 6 GB
- Around 50% lower typical power consumption: 80 Watt vs 120 Watt
- Around 50% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 5569 vs 3717
- Around 50% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 5034 vs 3359
- Around 50% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 5569 vs 3717
- Around 50% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 5034 vs 3359
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 80 Watt vs 120 Watt |
| Memory clock speed | 8008 MHz vs 8004 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 5569 vs 3717 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 5034 vs 3359 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 5569 vs 3717 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 5034 vs 3359 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile 6 GB
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile 6 GB |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 11690 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 782 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 57152 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 190.366 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1892.505 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 13.492 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 118.54 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 887.857 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 14998 | 12021 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 | 5569 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 | 5034 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 14998 | 12021 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 | 5569 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 | 5034 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 5413 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile 6 GB | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Turing | Pascal |
| Code name | TU116 | GP106 |
| Launch date | 14 March 2019 | 15 August 2016 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $219 | |
| Place in performance rating | 241 | 276 |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1785 MHz | 1670 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 1530 MHz | 1404 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 16 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 120 Watt | 80 Watt |
| Transistor count | 6,600 million | 4,400 million |
| Floating-point performance | 4,275 gflops | |
| Pipelines | 1280 | |
| Texture fill rate | 133.6 GTexel / s | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | No outputs |
| DisplayPort count | 1 | |
| DisplayPort support | ||
| HDMI | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | 229 mm | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Memory clock speed | 8004 MHz | 8008 MHz |
| Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | |
| Memory bandwidth | 192.2 GB / s | |
| Memory bus width | 192 Bit | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | |
Technologies |
||
| CUDA | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 with others
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1660 vs
ATIRadeon HD 4850 X2
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1660 vs
NVIDIAQuadro M6000
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1660 vs
AMDRadeon R7 M380
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1660 vs
NVIDIAQuadro M5500 Mobile
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1660 vs
AMDRadeon RX Vega
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1660 vs
AMDRadeon Pro W6900X
