NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 vs NVIDIA Quadro M6000

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 and NVIDIA Quadro M6000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660

• Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 11 month(s) later
• Around 55% higher core clock speed: 1530 MHz vs 988 MHz
• Around 60% higher boost clock speed: 1785 MHz vs 1114 MHz
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 28 nm
• 2.1x lower typical power consumption: 120 Watt vs 250 Watt
• Around 21% higher memory clock speed: 8004 MHz vs 6612 MHz
• Around 6% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 782 vs 737
• Around 53% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 57152 vs 37354
• Around 5% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 13.492 vs 12.895
• Around 16% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 887.857 vs 768.171
• Around 9% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 14998 vs 13738
• Around 9% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 14998 vs 13738

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro M6000

• Around 1% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 11792 vs 11691
• Around 9% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 207.14 vs 190.366
• Around 37% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 2593.621 vs 1892.505
• Around 22% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 145.003 vs 118.54

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro M6000

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	11691 11792
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	782 737
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	57152 37354
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	190.366 207.14
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1892.505 2593.621
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	13.492 12.895
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	118.54 145.003
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	887.857 768.171
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	14998 13738
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3717 3714
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3359 3356
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	14998 13738
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3717 3714
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3359 3356

Compare specifications (specs)