NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 vs NVIDIA Quadro M5500 Mobile
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 and NVIDIA Quadro M5500 Mobile videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 11 month(s) later
- Around 78% higher core clock speed: 1530 MHz vs 861 MHz
- Around 72% higher boost clock speed: 1785 MHz vs 1038 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 28 nm
- Around 25% lower typical power consumption: 120 Watt vs 150 Watt
- Around 14% higher memory clock speed: 8004 MHz vs 7012 MHz
- Around 48% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 11691 vs 7915
- Around 12% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 782 vs 698
- Around 27% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 14998 vs 11804
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3717 vs 3684
- Around 27% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 14998 vs 11804
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3717 vs 3684
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 14 March 2019 vs 8 April 2016 |
| Core clock speed | 1530 MHz vs 861 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1785 MHz vs 1038 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 120 Watt vs 150 Watt |
| Memory clock speed | 8004 MHz vs 7012 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 11691 vs 7915 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 782 vs 698 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 14998 vs 11804 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 vs 3684 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 14998 vs 11804 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 vs 3684 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro M5500 Mobile
- Around 25% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 4193 vs 3359
- Around 25% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 4193 vs 3359
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 4193 vs 3359 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 4193 vs 3359 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro M5500 Mobile
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 | NVIDIA Quadro M5500 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 11691 | 7915 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 782 | 698 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 57152 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 190.366 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1892.505 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 13.492 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 118.54 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 887.857 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 14998 | 11804 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 | 3684 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 | 4193 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 14998 | 11804 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 | 3684 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 | 4193 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 5414 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 | NVIDIA Quadro M5500 Mobile | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Turing | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Code name | TU116 | GM204 |
| Launch date | 14 March 2019 | 8 April 2016 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $219 | |
| Place in performance rating | 240 | 241 |
| Type | Desktop | Workstation |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1785 MHz | 1038 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 1530 MHz | 861 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 120 Watt | 150 Watt |
| Transistor count | 6,600 million | 5,200 million |
| Floating-point performance | 4,252 gflops | |
| Pipelines | 2048 | |
| Texture fill rate | 132.9 GTexel / s | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | No outputs |
| DisplayPort count | 1 | |
| DisplayPort support | ||
| HDMI | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | 229 mm | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
| Memory clock speed | 8004 MHz | 7012 MHz |
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | |
| Memory bandwidth | 224.4 GB / s | |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 with others
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1660 vs
NVIDIAQuadro M6000
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1660 vs
AMDRadeon R7 M380
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1660 vs
NVIDIAQuadro M5500 Mobile
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1660 vs
AMDRadeon RX Vega
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1660 vs
AMDRadeon Pro Vega 56
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1660 vs
AMDRadeon Pro W6900X
