NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 vs AMD Radeon RX Vega

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 and AMD Radeon RX Vega videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660

• Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 11 month(s) later
• Around 53% higher core clock speed: 1530 MHz vs 1000 MHz
• Around 49% higher boost clock speed: 1785 MHz vs 1200 MHz
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 14 nm
• Around 88% lower typical power consumption: 120 Watt vs 225 Watt
• 4x more memory clock speed: 8004 MHz vs 2000 MHz
• 7.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 14998 vs 2094
• Around 55% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3717 vs 2391
• 7.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 14998 vs 2094
• Around 55% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3717 vs 2391

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX Vega

• Around 5% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 12297 vs 11678
• Around 13% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 882 vs 780
• Around 17% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 67957 vs 57884
• Around 8% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 205.048 vs 189.842
• 2.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 3986.188 vs 1902.867
• Around 34% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 17.975 vs 13.408
• Around 85% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 215.468 vs 116.183
• Around 47% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1291.445 vs 875.838
• 2.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 8455 vs 3359
• 2.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 8455 vs 3359

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660
GPU 2: AMD Radeon RX Vega

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	11678 12297
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	780 882
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	57884 67957
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	189.842 205.048
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1902.867 3986.188
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	13.408 17.975
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	116.183 215.468
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	875.838 1291.445
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	14998 2094
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3717 2391
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3359 8455
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	14998 2094
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3717 2391
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3359 8455

Compare specifications (specs)