NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285M vs NVIDIA GeForce 9800M GTS
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285M and NVIDIA GeForce 9800M GTS videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 5 month(s) later
- 2.5x more core clock speed: 1500 MHz vs 600 MHz
- Around 98% higher texture fill rate: 38 billion / sec vs 19.2 GTexel / s
- 2x more pipelines: 128 vs 64
- 2x better floating-point performance: 384.0 gflops vs 192 gflops
- 2x more maximum memory size: 1 GB vs 512 MB
- Around 59% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 636 vs 401
- Around 29% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 128 vs 99
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 1 February 2010 vs 21 August 2008 |
Core clock speed | 1500 MHz vs 600 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 38 billion / sec vs 19.2 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 128 vs 64 |
Floating-point performance | 384.0 gflops vs 192 gflops |
Maximum memory size | 1 GB vs 512 MB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 636 vs 401 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 128 vs 99 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 9800M GTS
- Around 42% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3076 vs 2172
- Around 42% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3076 vs 2172
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3076 vs 2172 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3076 vs 2172 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 9800M GTS
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285M | NVIDIA GeForce 9800M GTS |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 636 | 401 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 128 | 99 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2172 | 3076 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2172 | 3076 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285M | NVIDIA GeForce 9800M GTS | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Tesla | Tesla |
Code name | G92 | G94 |
Launch date | 1 February 2010 | 21 August 2008 |
Place in performance rating | 1294 | 1297 |
Type | Laptop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 1500 MHz | 600 MHz |
CUDA cores | 128 | 64 |
Floating-point performance | 384.0 gflops | 192 gflops |
Gigaflops | 576 | 240 |
Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm | 65 nm |
Pipelines | 128 | 64 |
Texture fill rate | 38 billion / sec | 19.2 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 75 Watt |
Transistor count | 754 million | 505 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Audio input for HDMI | S / PDIF | |
Display Connectors | Single Link DVIVGALVDSHDMIDual Link DVIDisplayPort | No outputs |
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 | |
Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Laptop size | large | large |
MXM Type | MXM 3.0 Type-B | |
SLI options | 2-way | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 10.0 | 10.0 |
OpenGL | 2.1 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 512 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 61 GB / s | 51.2 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR3 |
Shared memory | 0 | 0 |
Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
CUDA | ||
HybridPower | ||
Power management | 8.0 | |
PureVideo HD |