NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285M vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 4800

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285M and NVIDIA Quadro FX 4800 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285M

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 2 month(s) later
  • 2.5x more core clock speed: 1500 MHz vs 602 MHz
  • 2x lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 150 Watt
  • Around 75% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 128 vs 73
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 1 February 2010 vs 11 November 2008
Core clock speed 1500 MHz vs 602 MHz
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 75 Watt vs 150 Watt
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark 128 vs 73

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro FX 4800

  • Around 1% higher texture fill rate: 38.5 GTexel / s vs 38 billion / sec
  • Around 50% higher pipelines: 192 vs 128
  • Around 20% better floating-point performance: 462.3 gflops vs 384.0 gflops
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 55 nm vs 65 nm
  • Around 50% higher maximum memory size: 1536 MB vs 1 GB
  • Around 54% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 982 vs 636
  • Around 55% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3358 vs 2172
  • Around 55% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3358 vs 2172
Specifications (specs)
Texture fill rate 38.5 GTexel / s vs 38 billion / sec
Pipelines 192 vs 128
Floating-point performance 462.3 gflops vs 384.0 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 55 nm vs 65 nm
Maximum memory size 1536 MB vs 1 GB
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 982 vs 636
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3358 vs 2172
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3358 vs 2172

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285M
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro FX 4800

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
636
982
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
128
73
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2172
3358
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2172
3358
Name NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285M NVIDIA Quadro FX 4800
PassMark - G3D Mark 636 982
PassMark - G2D Mark 128 73
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 2172 3358
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 2172 3358
Geekbench - OpenCL 15302

Compare specifications (specs)

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285M NVIDIA Quadro FX 4800

Essentials

Architecture Tesla Tesla 2.0
Code name G92 GT200B
Launch date 1 February 2010 11 November 2008
Place in performance rating 1294 1295
Type Laptop Workstation
Launch price (MSRP) $1,799
Price now $149.99
Value for money (0-100) 8.67

Technical info

Core clock speed 1500 MHz 602 MHz
CUDA cores 128
Floating-point performance 384.0 gflops 462.3 gflops
Gigaflops 576
Manufacturing process technology 65 nm 55 nm
Pipelines 128 192
Texture fill rate 38 billion / sec 38.5 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 75 Watt 150 Watt
Transistor count 754 million 1,400 million

Video outputs and ports

Audio input for HDMI S / PDIF
Display Connectors Single Link DVIVGALVDSHDMIDual Link DVIDisplayPort 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x S-Video
HDMI
Maximum VGA resolution 2048x1536

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Bus support PCI-E 2.0
Interface MXM-B (3.0) PCIe 2.0 x16
Laptop size large
MXM Type MXM 3.0 Type-B
SLI options 2-way
Length 267 mm
Supplementary power connectors 1x 6-pin

API support

DirectX 10.0 10.0
OpenGL 2.1 3.3

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 1536 MB
Memory bandwidth 61 GB / s 76.8 GB / s
Memory bus width 256 Bit 384 Bit
Memory type GDDR3 GDDR3
Shared memory 0
Memory clock speed 1600 MHz

Technologies

CUDA
HybridPower
Power management 8.0