NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285M vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700M

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285M and NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285M

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 4 month(s) later
  • 2.4x more core clock speed: 1500 MHz vs 625 MHz
  • 3.8x more texture fill rate: 38 billion / sec vs 10 GTexel / s
  • 4x more pipelines: 128 vs 32
  • 3.9x better floating-point performance: 384.0 gflops vs 99.2 gflops
  • 2x more maximum memory size: 1 GB vs 512 MB
  • 3.7x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 636 vs 173
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 1 February 2010 vs 1 October 2008
Core clock speed 1500 MHz vs 625 MHz
Texture fill rate 38 billion / sec vs 10 GTexel / s
Pipelines 128 vs 32
Floating-point performance 384.0 gflops vs 99.2 gflops
Maximum memory size 1 GB vs 512 MB
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 636 vs 173

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700M

  • Around 50% lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 75 Watt
  • Around 5% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 135 vs 128
  • Around 8% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2337 vs 2172
  • Around 8% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2337 vs 2172
Specifications (specs)
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 50 Watt vs 75 Watt
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark 135 vs 128
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 2337 vs 2172
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 2337 vs 2172

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285M
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700M

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
636
173
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
128
135
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2172
2337
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2172
2337
Name NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285M NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700M
PassMark - G3D Mark 636 173
PassMark - G2D Mark 128 135
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 2172 2337
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 2172 2337

Compare specifications (specs)

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285M NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700M

Essentials

Architecture Tesla Tesla
Code name G92 G96
Launch date 1 February 2010 1 October 2008
Place in performance rating 1294 1296
Type Laptop Mobile workstation

Technical info

Core clock speed 1500 MHz 625 MHz
CUDA cores 128
Floating-point performance 384.0 gflops 99.2 gflops
Gigaflops 576
Manufacturing process technology 65 nm 65 nm
Pipelines 128 32
Texture fill rate 38 billion / sec 10 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 75 Watt 50 Watt
Transistor count 754 million 314 million

Video outputs and ports

Audio input for HDMI S / PDIF
Display Connectors Single Link DVIVGALVDSHDMIDual Link DVIDisplayPort No outputs
HDMI
Maximum VGA resolution 2048x1536
HDCP

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Bus support PCI-E 2.0
Interface MXM-B (3.0) MXM-II
Laptop size large large
MXM Type MXM 3.0 Type-B
SLI options 2-way

API support

DirectX 10.0 10.0
OpenGL 2.1 3.3

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 512 MB
Memory bandwidth 61 GB / s 25.6 GB / s
Memory bus width 256 Bit 128 Bit
Memory type GDDR3 GDDR3
Shared memory 0 0
Memory clock speed 1600 MHz

Technologies

CUDA
HybridPower
Power management 8.0
PowerMizer 8.0
PureVideo HD