NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285M vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700M
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285M and NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 4 month(s) later
- 2.4x more core clock speed: 1500 MHz vs 625 MHz
- 3.8x more texture fill rate: 38 billion / sec vs 10 GTexel / s
- 4x more pipelines: 128 vs 32
- 3.9x better floating-point performance: 384.0 gflops vs 99.2 gflops
- 2x more maximum memory size: 1 GB vs 512 MB
- 3.7x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 636 vs 173
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 1 February 2010 vs 1 October 2008 |
Core clock speed | 1500 MHz vs 625 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 38 billion / sec vs 10 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 128 vs 32 |
Floating-point performance | 384.0 gflops vs 99.2 gflops |
Maximum memory size | 1 GB vs 512 MB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 636 vs 173 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700M
- Around 50% lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 75 Watt
- Around 5% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 135 vs 128
- Around 8% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2337 vs 2172
- Around 8% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2337 vs 2172
Specifications (specs) | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt vs 75 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 135 vs 128 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2337 vs 2172 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2337 vs 2172 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285M
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700M
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285M | NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 636 | 173 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 128 | 135 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2172 | 2337 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2172 | 2337 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285M | NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Tesla | Tesla |
Code name | G92 | G96 |
Launch date | 1 February 2010 | 1 October 2008 |
Place in performance rating | 1294 | 1296 |
Type | Laptop | Mobile workstation |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 1500 MHz | 625 MHz |
CUDA cores | 128 | |
Floating-point performance | 384.0 gflops | 99.2 gflops |
Gigaflops | 576 | |
Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm | 65 nm |
Pipelines | 128 | 32 |
Texture fill rate | 38 billion / sec | 10 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 50 Watt |
Transistor count | 754 million | 314 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Audio input for HDMI | S / PDIF | |
Display Connectors | Single Link DVIVGALVDSHDMIDual Link DVIDisplayPort | No outputs |
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
HDCP | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 | |
Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | MXM-II |
Laptop size | large | large |
MXM Type | MXM 3.0 Type-B | |
SLI options | 2-way | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 10.0 | 10.0 |
OpenGL | 2.1 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 512 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 61 GB / s | 25.6 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR3 |
Shared memory | 0 | 0 |
Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
CUDA | ||
HybridPower | ||
Power management | 8.0 | |
PowerMizer 8.0 | ||
PureVideo HD |