NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 vs NVIDIA GeForce 9100

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 and NVIDIA GeForce 9100 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460

• Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 2 month(s) later
• Around 35% higher core clock speed: 675 MHz vs 500 MHz
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 40 nm vs 80 nm
• 27.7x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2271 vs 82
• Around 12% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 387 vs 345
• 4.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3356 vs 795
• 4.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3356 vs 795

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 9100

• 4x lower typical power consumption: 40 Watt vs 160 Watt

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 9100

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	2271 82
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	387 345
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3356 795
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3356 795

Compare specifications (specs)