NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580M vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580M and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 11 month(s) later
- Around 5% higher texture fill rate: 39.7 billion / sec vs 37.8 GTexel / s
- Around 14% higher pipelines: 384 vs 336
- Around 5% better floating-point performance: 952.3 gflops vs 907.2 gflops
- Around 60% lower typical power consumption: 100 Watt vs 160 Watt
- 2.7x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 768 MB
- Around 14% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 24.415 vs 21.445
- Around 12% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 690.98 vs 617.847
- Around 9% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 29.702 vs 27.222
- Around 66% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 67.215 vs 40.61
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 28 June 2011 vs 12 July 2010 |
Texture fill rate | 39.7 billion / sec vs 37.8 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 384 vs 336 |
Floating-point performance | 952.3 gflops vs 907.2 gflops |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 100 Watt vs 160 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 768 MB |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 24.415 vs 21.445 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 690.98 vs 617.847 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.83 vs 1.823 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 29.702 vs 27.222 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 67.215 vs 40.61 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460
- Around 9% higher core clock speed: 675 MHz vs 620 MHz
- 2.4x more memory clock speed: 3600 MHz vs 1500 MHz
- Around 9% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2270 vs 2074
- Around 11% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 387 vs 349
- Around 23% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 7852 vs 6389
- Around 26% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3351 vs 2664
- Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3716 vs 3626
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3356 vs 3318
- Around 26% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3351 vs 2664
- Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3716 vs 3626
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3356 vs 3318
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 675 MHz vs 620 MHz |
Memory clock speed | 3600 MHz vs 1500 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2270 vs 2074 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 387 vs 349 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 7852 vs 6389 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3351 vs 2664 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3716 vs 3626 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 vs 3318 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3351 vs 2664 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3716 vs 3626 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 vs 3318 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580M | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2074 | 2270 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 349 | 387 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 6389 | 7852 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 24.415 | 21.445 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 690.98 | 617.847 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.83 | 1.823 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 29.702 | 27.222 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 67.215 | 40.61 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2664 | 3351 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3626 | 3716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3318 | 3356 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2664 | 3351 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3626 | 3716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3318 | 3356 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580M | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Fermi 2.0 | Fermi |
Code name | GF114 | GF104 |
Launch date | 28 June 2011 | 12 July 2010 |
Place in performance rating | 931 | 932 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $229 | |
Price now | $89.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 34.71 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 620 MHz | 675 MHz |
CUDA cores | 384 | |
Floating-point performance | 952.3 gflops | 907.2 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 384 | 336 |
Texture fill rate | 39.7 billion / sec | 37.8 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 100 Watt | 160 Watt |
Transistor count | 1,950 million | 1,950 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI, Two Dual Link DVI, Mini HDMI |
Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 | 16x PCI-E 2.0 |
Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Laptop size | large | |
SLI options | 2-way | 2-way |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 6-pin & 6-pin |
Height | 4.376"(111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
Length | 8.25"(210 mm) (21 cm) | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 API | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.1 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 768 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 96.0 GB / s | 86.4 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 192 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1500 MHz | 3600 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Blu-Ray | ||
3D Gaming | ||
3D Vision | ||
CUDA | ||
DirectX 11 | DirectX 11 | |
Optimus | ||
SLI |