NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 vs ATI Radeon X1950 GT
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 and ATI Radeon X1950 GT videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 5 month(s) later
- Around 35% higher core clock speed: 675 MHz vs 500 MHz
- 6.3x more texture fill rate: 37.8 GTexel / s vs 6 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 40 nm vs 80 nm
- 3x more maximum memory size: 768 MB vs 256 MB
- 3x more memory clock speed: 3600 MHz vs 1200 MHz
- 21.4x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2271 vs 106
- Around 39% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 387 vs 279
- Around 33% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3356 vs 2517
- Around 33% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3356 vs 2517
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 12 July 2010 vs 29 January 2007 |
Core clock speed | 675 MHz vs 500 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 37.8 GTexel / s vs 6 GTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm vs 80 nm |
Maximum memory size | 768 MB vs 256 MB |
Memory clock speed | 3600 MHz vs 1200 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2271 vs 106 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 387 vs 279 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 vs 2517 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 vs 2517 |
Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon X1950 GT
- 2.8x lower typical power consumption: 57 Watt vs 160 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 57 Watt vs 160 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460
GPU 2: ATI Radeon X1950 GT
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 | ATI Radeon X1950 GT |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2271 | 106 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 387 | 279 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 7861 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 21.445 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 617.847 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.823 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 27.222 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 40.61 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3351 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3716 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 | 2517 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3351 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3716 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 | 2517 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 | ATI Radeon X1950 GT | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Fermi | R500 |
Code name | GF104 | RV570 |
Launch date | 12 July 2010 | 29 January 2007 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $229 | $140 |
Place in performance rating | 930 | 933 |
Price now | $89.99 | |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Value for money (0-100) | 34.71 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 675 MHz | 500 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 907.2 gflops | |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 80 nm |
Pipelines | 336 | |
Texture fill rate | 37.8 GTexel / s | 6 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 160 Watt | 57 Watt |
Transistor count | 1,950 million | 330 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI, Two Dual Link DVI, Mini HDMI | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video |
HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | 16x PCI-E 2.0 | |
Height | 4.376"(111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
Length | 8.25"(210 mm) (21 cm) | |
SLI options | 2-way | |
Supplementary power connectors | 6-pin & 6-pin | 1x 6-pin |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 9.0c |
OpenGL | 4.1 | 2.0 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 768 MB | 256 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 86.4 GB / s | 38.4 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 192 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 3600 MHz | 1200 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR3 |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
CUDA | ||
SLI |