NVIDIA GeForce GTX 550 Ti vs ATI Radeon HD 3650 AGP
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 550 Ti and ATI Radeon HD 3650 AGP videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 550 Ti
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 1 month(s) later
- 2.5x more core clock speed: 1800 MHz vs 725 MHz
- 5x more texture fill rate: 28.8 billion / sec vs 5.8 GTexel / s
- Around 60% higher pipelines: 192 vs 120
- 4x better floating-point performance: 691.2 gflops vs 174 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 40 nm vs 55 nm
- 2x more maximum memory size: 1 GB vs 512 MB
- Around 3% higher memory clock speed: 1026 MHz vs 1000 MHz
- 10.4x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1553 vs 150
- 2.4x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 376 vs 155
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 15 March 2011 vs 23 January 2008 |
Core clock speed | 1800 MHz vs 725 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 28.8 billion / sec vs 5.8 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 192 vs 120 |
Floating-point performance | 691.2 gflops vs 174 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm vs 55 nm |
Maximum memory size | 1 GB vs 512 MB |
Memory clock speed | 1026 MHz vs 1000 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1553 vs 150 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 376 vs 155 |
Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon HD 3650 AGP
- Around 78% lower typical power consumption: 65 Watt vs 116 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt vs 116 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 550 Ti
GPU 2: ATI Radeon HD 3650 AGP
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 550 Ti | ATI Radeon HD 3650 AGP |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1553 | 150 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 376 | 155 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 5767 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 18.461 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 354.392 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.125 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 18.511 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 41.941 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2488 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3351 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3322 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2488 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3351 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3322 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 322 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 550 Ti | ATI Radeon HD 3650 AGP | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Fermi 2.0 | TeraScale |
Code name | GF116 | RV635 |
Launch date | 15 March 2011 | 23 January 2008 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $149 | |
Place in performance rating | 1061 | 1063 |
Price now | $287.59 | |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Value for money (0-100) | 7.49 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 1800 MHz | 725 MHz |
CUDA cores | 192 | |
Floating-point performance | 691.2 gflops | 174 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 55 nm |
Maximum GPU temperature | 100 °C | |
Pipelines | 192 | 120 |
Texture fill rate | 28.8 billion / sec | 5.8 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 116 Watt | 65 Watt |
Transistor count | 1,170 million | 378 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
Display Connectors | Two Dual Link DVI-IMini HDMI, 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video |
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | 16x PCI-E 2.0 | |
Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | AGP 8x |
Length | 8.25" (21 cm) | |
SLI options | 2-way | |
Supplementary power connectors | One 6-pin | None |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 10.1 |
OpenGL | 4.2 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 512 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 98.4 GB / s | 16 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 192 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1026 MHz | 1000 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR2 |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
CUDA | ||
DSR | ||
SLI |