NVIDIA GeForce GTX 550 Ti vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 280

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 550 Ti and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 280 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 550 Ti

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 8 month(s) later
  • Around 39% higher core clock speed: 1800 MHz vs 1296 MHz
  • Around 11% better floating-point performance: 691.2 gflops vs 622.1 gflops
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 40 nm vs 65 nm
  • 2x lower typical power consumption: 116 Watt vs 236 Watt
  • Around 20% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1553 vs 1299
  • 6.1x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 376 vs 62
  • Around 24% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3351 vs 2697
  • Around 24% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3351 vs 2697
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 15 March 2011 vs 16 June 2008
Core clock speed 1800 MHz vs 1296 MHz
Floating-point performance 691.2 gflops vs 622.1 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 40 nm vs 65 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 116 Watt vs 236 Watt
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 1553 vs 1299
PassMark - G2D Mark 376 vs 62
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3351 vs 2697
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3351 vs 2697

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 280

  • Around 67% higher texture fill rate: 48.2 billion / sec vs 28.8 billion / sec
  • Around 25% higher pipelines: 240 vs 192
  • Around 8% higher memory clock speed: 1107 MHz vs 1026 MHz
  • 3.7x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 21396 vs 5767
Specifications (specs)
Texture fill rate 48.2 billion / sec vs 28.8 billion / sec
Pipelines 240 vs 192
Memory clock speed 1107 MHz vs 1026 MHz
Benchmarks
Geekbench - OpenCL 21396 vs 5767
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3325 vs 3322
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3325 vs 3322

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 550 Ti
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 280

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
1553
1299
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
376
62
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
5767
21396
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3351
2697
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3322
3325
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3351
2697
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3322
3325
Name NVIDIA GeForce GTX 550 Ti NVIDIA GeForce GTX 280
PassMark - G3D Mark 1553 1299
PassMark - G2D Mark 376 62
Geekbench - OpenCL 5767 21396
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 18.461
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 354.392
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 1.125
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 18.511
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 41.941
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 2488
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3351 2697
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3322 3325
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 2488
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3351 2697
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3322 3325
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 322

Compare specifications (specs)

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 550 Ti NVIDIA GeForce GTX 280

Essentials

Architecture Fermi 2.0 Tesla 2.0
Code name GF116 GT200
Launch date 15 March 2011 16 June 2008
Launch price (MSRP) $149 $649
Place in performance rating 1061 1062
Price now $287.59 $522.78
Type Desktop Desktop
Value for money (0-100) 7.49 2.98

Technical info

Core clock speed 1800 MHz 1296 MHz
CUDA cores 192 240
Floating-point performance 691.2 gflops 622.1 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 40 nm 65 nm
Maximum GPU temperature 100 °C 105 °C
Pipelines 192 240
Texture fill rate 28.8 billion / sec 48.2 billion / sec
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 116 Watt 236 Watt
Transistor count 1,170 million 1,400 million

Video outputs and ports

Audio input for HDMI Internal S / PDIF
Display Connectors Two Dual Link DVI-IMini HDMI, 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI 2x DVI, 1x S-Video, HDTVDual Link DVI
HDMI
Maximum VGA resolution 2048x1536 2048x1536
Multi monitor support

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Bus support 16x PCI-E 2.0
Height 4.376" (11.1 cm) 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm)
Interface PCIe 2.0 x16 PCIe 2.0 x16
Length 8.25" (21 cm) 10.5" (267 mm) (26.7 cm)
SLI options 2-way 2-way3-way
Supplementary power connectors One 6-pin 6-pin & 8-pin

API support

DirectX 12.0 (11_0) 10.0
OpenGL 4.2 2.1

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 1 GB
Memory bandwidth 98.4 GB / s 141.7 GB / s
Memory bus width 192 Bit 512 Bit
Memory clock speed 1026 MHz 1107 MHz
Memory type GDDR5 GDDR3

Technologies

3D Vision
CUDA
DSR
SLI