Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 550 Ti
Comparative analysis of Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 550 Ti videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655
- Videocard is newer: launch date 6 year(s) 5 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 40 nm
- 7.7x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 116 Watt
- Around 12% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1733 vs 1553
- Around 28% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 7354 vs 5767
- 2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 37.109 vs 18.461
- Around 31% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 465.116 vs 354.392
- 2.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.796 vs 1.125
- Around 57% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 29.115 vs 18.511
- Around 31% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 54.932 vs 41.941
- Around 12% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2780 vs 2488
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3343 vs 3322
- Around 12% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2780 vs 2488
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3343 vs 3322
- Around 92% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 619 vs 322
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 1 September 2017 vs 15 March 2011 |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 40 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 116 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1733 vs 1553 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 7354 vs 5767 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 37.109 vs 18.461 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 465.116 vs 354.392 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.796 vs 1.125 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 29.115 vs 18.511 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 54.932 vs 41.941 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2780 vs 2488 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3343 vs 3322 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2780 vs 2488 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3343 vs 3322 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 619 vs 322 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 550 Ti
- 6x more core clock speed: 1800 MHz vs 300 MHz
- 4x more pipelines: 192 vs 48
- Around 4% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 376 vs 362
- Around 78% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3351 vs 1884
- Around 78% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3351 vs 1884
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1800 MHz vs 300 MHz |
Pipelines | 192 vs 48 |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 376 vs 362 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3351 vs 1884 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3351 vs 1884 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 550 Ti
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 550 Ti |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1733 | 1553 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 362 | 376 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 7354 | 5767 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 37.109 | 18.461 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 465.116 | 354.392 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.796 | 1.125 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 29.115 | 18.511 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 54.932 | 41.941 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2780 | 2488 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1884 | 3351 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3343 | 3322 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2780 | 2488 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1884 | 3351 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3343 | 3322 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 619 | 322 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 550 Ti | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Generation 9.5 | Fermi 2.0 |
Code name | Coffee Lake GT3e | GF116 |
Launch date | 1 September 2017 | 15 March 2011 |
Place in performance rating | 1058 | 1061 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $149 | |
Price now | $287.59 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 7.49 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1200 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 1800 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 48 | 192 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 116 Watt |
Transistor count | 189 million | 1,170 million |
CUDA cores | 192 | |
Floating-point performance | 691.2 gflops | |
Maximum GPU temperature | 100 °C | |
Texture fill rate | 28.8 billion / sec | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | Two Dual Link DVI-IMini HDMI, 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI |
Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Bus support | 16x PCI-E 2.0 | |
Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
Length | 8.25" (21 cm) | |
SLI options | 2-way | |
Supplementary power connectors | One 6-pin | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.2 |
Memory |
||
Memory type | DDR3 / DDR4 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 98.4 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 192 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 1026 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
CUDA | ||
DSR | ||
SLI |