NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 550 Ti

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 550 Ti videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M

• Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 2 month(s) later
• Around 92% higher texture fill rate: 55.23 GTexel / s vs 28.8 billion / sec
• 4x more pipelines: 768 vs 192
• Around 92% better floating-point performance: 1,326 gflops vs 691.2 gflops
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
• Around 55% lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 116 Watt
• 2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
• Around 95% higher memory clock speed: 2000 MHz vs 1026 MHz
• Around 29% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1998 vs 1553
• Around 26% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 7244 vs 5767
• Around 47% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 520.747 vs 354.392
• Around 8% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 19.952 vs 18.511
• Around 4% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 43.535 vs 41.941
• Around 28% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3188 vs 2488
• Around 28% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3188 vs 2488
• 2.4x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 759 vs 322

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 550 Ti

• 2.1x more core clock speed: 1800 MHz vs 850 MHz
• Around 30% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 376 vs 289
• 2.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 18.461 vs 8.832
• Around 54% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.125 vs 0.731
• Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3351 vs 3275
• Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3351 vs 3275

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 550 Ti

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	1998 1553
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	289 376
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	7244 5767
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	8.832 18.461
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	520.747 354.392
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	0.731 1.125
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	19.952 18.511
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	43.535 41.941
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3188 2488
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3275 3351
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3333 3322
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3188 2488
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3275 3351
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3333 3322
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	759 322

Compare specifications (specs)