NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 550 Ti

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 550 Ti videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 2 month(s) later
  • Around 92% higher texture fill rate: 55.23 GTexel / s vs 28.8 billion / sec
  • 4x more pipelines: 768 vs 192
  • Around 92% better floating-point performance: 1,326 gflops vs 691.2 gflops
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
  • Around 55% lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 116 Watt
  • 2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
  • Around 95% higher memory clock speed: 2000 MHz vs 1026 MHz
  • Around 29% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1998 vs 1554
  • Around 26% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 7244 vs 5772
  • Around 47% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 520.747 vs 354.392
  • Around 8% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 19.952 vs 18.511
  • Around 4% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 43.535 vs 41.941
  • Around 28% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3188 vs 2488
  • Around 28% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3188 vs 2488
  • 2.4x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 759 vs 322
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 30 May 2013 vs 15 March 2011
Texture fill rate 55.23 GTexel / s vs 28.8 billion / sec
Pipelines 768 vs 192
Floating-point performance 1,326 gflops vs 691.2 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm vs 40 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 75 Watt vs 116 Watt
Maximum memory size 2 GB vs 1 GB
Memory clock speed 2000 MHz vs 1026 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 1998 vs 1554
Geekbench - OpenCL 7244 vs 5772
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 520.747 vs 354.392
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 19.952 vs 18.511
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 43.535 vs 41.941
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 3188 vs 2488
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3333 vs 3322
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 3188 vs 2488
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3333 vs 3322
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 759 vs 322

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 550 Ti

  • 2.1x more core clock speed: 1800 MHz vs 850 MHz
  • Around 30% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 375 vs 289
  • 2.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 18.461 vs 8.832
  • Around 54% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.125 vs 0.731
  • Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3351 vs 3275
  • Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3351 vs 3275
Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed 1800 MHz vs 850 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark 375 vs 289
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 18.461 vs 8.832
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 1.125 vs 0.731
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3351 vs 3275
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3351 vs 3275

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 550 Ti

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
1998
1554
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
289
375
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
7244
5772
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
8.832
18.461
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
520.747
354.392
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
0.731
1.125
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
19.952
18.511
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
43.535
41.941
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3188
2488
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3275
3351
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3333
3322
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3188
2488
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3275
3351
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3333
3322
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score
GPU 1
GPU 2
759
322
Name NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M NVIDIA GeForce GTX 550 Ti
PassMark - G3D Mark 1998 1554
PassMark - G2D Mark 289 375
Geekbench - OpenCL 7244 5772
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 8.832 18.461
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 520.747 354.392
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 0.731 1.125
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 19.952 18.511
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 43.535 41.941
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 3188 2488
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3275 3351
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3333 3322
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 3188 2488
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3275 3351
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3333 3322
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 759 322

Compare specifications (specs)

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M NVIDIA GeForce GTX 550 Ti

Essentials

Architecture Kepler Fermi 2.0
Code name GK106 GF116
Launch date 30 May 2013 15 March 2011
Place in performance rating 1059 1061
Type Laptop Desktop
Launch price (MSRP) $149
Price now $287.59
Value for money (0-100) 7.49

Technical info

Boost clock speed 863 MHz
Core clock speed 850 MHz 1800 MHz
CUDA cores 768 192
Floating-point performance 1,326 gflops 691.2 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm 40 nm
Pipelines 768 192
Texture fill rate 55.23 GTexel / s 28.8 billion / sec
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 75 Watt 116 Watt
Transistor count 2,540 million 1,170 million
Maximum GPU temperature 100 °C

Video outputs and ports

7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI
Display Connectors No outputs Two Dual Link DVI-IMini HDMI, 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support Up to 3840x2160
eDP 1.2 signal support Up to 3840x2160
HDCP content protection
HDMI
LVDS signal support Up to 1920x1200
TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming
VGA аnalog display support Up to 2048x1536
Audio input for HDMI Internal
Maximum VGA resolution 2048x1536
Multi monitor support

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Bus support PCI Express 3.0, PCI Express 2.0 16x PCI-E 2.0
Interface MXM-B (3.0) PCIe 2.0 x16
Laptop size large
SLI options 1 2-way
Height 4.376" (11.1 cm)
Length 8.25" (21 cm)
Supplementary power connectors One 6-pin

API support

DirectX 12 API 12.0 (11_0)
OpenCL 1.1
OpenGL 4.5 4.2

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 1 GB
Memory bandwidth 64.0 GB / s 98.4 GB / s
Memory bus width 128 Bit 192 Bit
Memory clock speed 2000 MHz 1026 MHz
Memory type GDDR5 GDDR5
Shared memory 0
Standard memory configuration GDDR5

Technologies

3D Vision
3D Vision / 3DTV Play
Blu-Ray 3D Support
CUDA
Direct Compute
FXAA
GPU Boost
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder
Optimus
SLI
TXAA
Verde Drivers
DSR