NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 vs ATI FirePro V5800
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 and ATI FirePro V5800 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 0 month(s) later
- Around 17% higher core clock speed: 810 MHz vs 690 MHz
- Around 64% higher texture fill rate: 45.4 GTexel / s vs 27.6 GTexel / s
- 2.4x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2774 vs 1180
- Around 56% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 434 vs 278
- 2.8x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 8699 vs 3085
- Around 76% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3754 vs 2135
- Around 10% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3667 vs 3319
- Around 76% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3754 vs 2135
- Around 10% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3667 vs 3319
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 17 May 2011 vs 26 April 2010 |
| Core clock speed | 810 MHz vs 690 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 45.4 GTexel / s vs 27.6 GTexel / s |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2774 vs 1180 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 434 vs 278 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 8699 vs 3085 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3754 vs 2135 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3667 vs 3319 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3754 vs 2135 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3667 vs 3319 |
Reasons to consider the ATI FirePro V5800
- 2.4x more pipelines: 800 vs 336
- Around 1% better floating-point performance: 1,104.0 gflops vs 1,088.6 gflops
- 2x lower typical power consumption: 74 Watt vs 150 Watt
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3352 vs 3332
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3352 vs 3332
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Pipelines | 800 vs 336 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,104.0 gflops vs 1,088.6 gflops |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 74 Watt vs 150 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3352 vs 3332 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3352 vs 3332 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560
GPU 2: ATI FirePro V5800
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 | ATI FirePro V5800 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2774 | 1180 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 434 | 278 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 8699 | 3085 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 25.82 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 623.187 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.201 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 30.402 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 62.233 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3754 | 2135 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3667 | 3319 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3332 | 3352 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3754 | 2135 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3667 | 3319 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3332 | 3352 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 | ATI FirePro V5800 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Fermi 2.0 | TeraScale 2 |
| Code name | GF114 | Juniper |
| Launch date | 17 May 2011 | 26 April 2010 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $199 | $479 |
| Place in performance rating | 855 | 857 |
| Price now | $353.59 | |
| Type | Desktop | Workstation |
| Value for money (0-100) | 10.61 | |
Technical info |
||
| Core clock speed | 810 MHz | 690 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 1,088.6 gflops | 1,104.0 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 40 nm |
| Maximum GPU temperature | 99 °C | |
| Pipelines | 336 | 800 |
| Texture fill rate | 45.4 GTexel / s | 27.6 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt | 74 Watt |
| Transistor count | 1,950 million | 1,040 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
| Display Connectors | Two Dual Link DVI, Mini HDMI, 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort |
| HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Bus support | 16x PCI-E 2.0 | |
| Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Length | 8.25" (21 cm) | 229 mm |
| SLI options | 2-Way | |
| Supplementary power connectors | Two 6-pin | None |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 11.2 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.1 | 4.4 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 1 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 128.0 GB / s | 64.0 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz | 4000 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Blu-Ray | ||
| 3D Gaming | ||
| 3D Vision | ||
| CUDA | ||
| SLI | ||
