NVIDIA GeForce GTX 860M vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 860M and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 860M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 9 month(s) later
- Around 90% higher pipelines: 640 vs 336
- Around 28% better floating-point performance: 1,389 gflops vs 1,088.6 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
- 2x lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 150 Watt
- 2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
- Around 11% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3062 vs 2768
- Around 20% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 10438 vs 8692
- Around 56% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.427 vs 2.201
- 2.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 162.83 vs 62.233
- Around 32% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4938 vs 3754
- Around 32% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4938 vs 3754
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 10 March 2014 vs 17 May 2011 |
Pipelines | 640 vs 336 |
Floating-point performance | 1,389 gflops vs 1,088.6 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 40 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt vs 150 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 1 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3062 vs 2768 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 10438 vs 8692 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.427 vs 2.201 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 162.83 vs 62.233 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4938 vs 3754 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3684 vs 3667 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3340 vs 3332 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4938 vs 3754 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3684 vs 3667 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3340 vs 3332 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560
- Around 2% higher core clock speed: 810 MHz vs 797 MHz
- Around 5% higher texture fill rate: 45.4 GTexel / s vs 43.4 GTexel / s
- Around 91% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 431 vs 226
- Around 13% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 25.82 vs 22.828
- 3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 623.187 vs 210.585
- Around 6% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 30.402 vs 28.662
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 810 MHz vs 797 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 45.4 GTexel / s vs 43.4 GTexel / s |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 431 vs 226 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 25.82 vs 22.828 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 623.187 vs 210.585 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 30.402 vs 28.662 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 860M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 860M | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3062 | 2768 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 226 | 431 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 10438 | 8692 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 22.828 | 25.82 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 210.585 | 623.187 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.427 | 2.201 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 28.662 | 30.402 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 162.83 | 62.233 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4938 | 3754 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3684 | 3667 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3340 | 3332 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4938 | 3754 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3684 | 3667 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3340 | 3332 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1151 | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 860M | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Kepler | Fermi 2.0 |
Code name | GK104 | GF114 |
Launch date | 10 March 2014 | 17 May 2011 |
Place in performance rating | 878 | 865 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $199 | |
Price now | $353.59 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 10.61 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 915 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 797 MHz | 810 MHz |
CUDA cores | 1152 or 640 | |
Floating-point performance | 1,389 gflops | 1,088.6 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 640 | 336 |
Texture fill rate | 43.4 GTexel / s | 45.4 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 150 Watt |
Transistor count | 3,540 million | 1,950 million |
Maximum GPU temperature | 99 °C | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI | ||
Display Connectors | No outputs | Two Dual Link DVI, Mini HDMI, 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI |
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
eDP 1.2 signal support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
HDCP content protection | ||
HDMI | ||
LVDS signal support | Up to 1920x1200 | |
TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming | ||
VGA аnalog display support | Up to 2048x1536 | |
Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
HDCP | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0 | 16x PCI-E 2.0 |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | Two 6-pin |
Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
Length | 8.25" (21 cm) | |
SLI options | 2-Way | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.1 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 1 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 80.0 GB / s | 128.0 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Standard memory configuration | GDDR5 | |
Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
3D Blu-Ray | ||
Adaptive VSync | ||
Ansel | ||
BatteryBoost | ||
CUDA | ||
Direct Compute | ||
FXAA | ||
GeForce Experience | ||
GeForce ShadowPlay | ||
GPU Boost | ||
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | ||
Optimus | ||
SLI | ||
TXAA | ||
3D Gaming | ||
3D Vision |