NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 vs ATI Radeon X1600 XT
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 and ATI Radeon X1600 XT videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 7 month(s) later
- Around 37% higher core clock speed: 810 MHz vs 590 MHz
- 19.2x more texture fill rate: 45.4 GTexel / s vs 2.36 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 40 nm vs 90 nm
- 4x more maximum memory size: 1 GB vs 256 MB
- 2.9x more memory clock speed: 4000 MHz vs 1380 MHz
- 23.9x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2774 vs 116
- Around 22% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 434 vs 356
- Around 91% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3332 vs 1745
- Around 91% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3332 vs 1745
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 17 May 2011 vs 1 October 2007 |
Core clock speed | 810 MHz vs 590 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 45.4 GTexel / s vs 2.36 GTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm vs 90 nm |
Maximum memory size | 1 GB vs 256 MB |
Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz vs 1380 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2774 vs 116 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 434 vs 356 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3332 vs 1745 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3332 vs 1745 |
Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon X1600 XT
- 3.6x lower typical power consumption: 42 Watt vs 150 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 42 Watt vs 150 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560
GPU 2: ATI Radeon X1600 XT
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 | ATI Radeon X1600 XT |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2774 | 116 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 434 | 356 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 8699 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 25.82 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 623.187 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.201 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 30.402 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 62.233 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3754 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3667 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3332 | 1745 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3754 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3667 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3332 | 1745 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 | ATI Radeon X1600 XT | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Fermi 2.0 | R500 |
Code name | GF114 | RV530 |
Launch date | 17 May 2011 | 1 October 2007 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $199 | |
Place in performance rating | 855 | 858 |
Price now | $353.59 | |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Value for money (0-100) | 10.61 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 810 MHz | 590 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 1,088.6 gflops | |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 90 nm |
Maximum GPU temperature | 99 °C | |
Pipelines | 336 | |
Texture fill rate | 45.4 GTexel / s | 2.36 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt | 42 Watt |
Transistor count | 1,950 million | 157 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
Display Connectors | Two Dual Link DVI, Mini HDMI, 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI | 1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video |
HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | 16x PCI-E 2.0 | |
Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
Length | 8.25" (21 cm) | |
SLI options | 2-Way | |
Supplementary power connectors | Two 6-pin | None |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 9.0c |
OpenGL | 4.1 | 2.0 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 256 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 128.0 GB / s | 22.08 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz | 1380 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR3 |
Technologies |
||
3D Blu-Ray | ||
3D Gaming | ||
3D Vision | ||
CUDA | ||
SLI |