NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti vs ATI Radeon E4690
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti and ATI Radeon E4690 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- Around 53% higher core clock speed: 915 MHz vs 600 MHz
- 5.3x more texture fill rate: 102.5 billion / sec vs 19.2 GTexel / s
- 4.2x more pipelines: 1344 vs 320
- 6.4x better floating-point performance: 2,459.5 gflops vs 384.0 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 55 nm
- 4x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 512 MB
- 10.9x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 4412 vs 405
- Around 34% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 466 vs 347
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3337 vs 3302
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3337 vs 3302
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 16 August 2012 vs 1 June 2009 |
Core clock speed | 915 MHz vs 600 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 102.5 billion / sec vs 19.2 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 1344 vs 320 |
Floating-point performance | 2,459.5 gflops vs 384.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 55 nm |
Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 512 MB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 4412 vs 405 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 466 vs 347 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3337 vs 3302 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3337 vs 3302 |
Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon E4690
- 5x lower typical power consumption: 30 Watt vs 150 Watt
- 233.3x more memory clock speed: 1400 MHz vs 6.0 GB/s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt vs 150 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 1400 MHz vs 6.0 GB/s |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti
GPU 2: ATI Radeon E4690
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti | ATI Radeon E4690 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 4412 | 405 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 466 | 347 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 15349 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 36.256 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1029.267 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.037 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 45.894 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 82.191 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3285 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3684 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3337 | 3302 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3285 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3684 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3337 | 3302 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1615 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti | ATI Radeon E4690 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Kepler | TeraScale |
Code name | GK104 | RV730 |
Launch date | 16 August 2012 | 1 June 2009 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $299 | |
Place in performance rating | 726 | 729 |
Price now | $321.99 | |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Value for money (0-100) | 17.34 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 980 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 915 MHz | 600 MHz |
CUDA cores | 1344 | |
Floating-point performance | 2,459.5 gflops | 384.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 55 nm |
Pipelines | 1344 | 320 |
Texture fill rate | 102.5 billion / sec | 19.2 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt | 30 Watt |
Transistor count | 3,540 million | 514 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort, One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI... | |
G-SYNC support | ||
HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-II |
Length | 9.5" (24.1 cm) | |
SLI options | 3-way | |
Supplementary power connectors | Two 6-pin | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 10.1 |
OpenGL | 4.3 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 512 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 144.2 GB / s | 22.4 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 192-bit GDDR5 | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 6.0 GB/s | 1400 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR3 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Blu-Ray | ||
3D Gaming | ||
3D Vision | ||
Adaptive VSync | ||
CUDA | ||
FXAA | ||
GPU Boost | ||
SLI | ||
TXAA |