NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 6 month(s) later
- Around 11% higher core clock speed: 1020 MHz vs 915 MHz
- Around 11% higher boost clock speed: 1085 MHz vs 980 MHz
- 2.5x lower typical power consumption: 60 Watt vs 150 Watt
- Around 11% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 517 vs 466
- Around 17% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 42.463 vs 36.256
- Around 62% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 133.458 vs 82.191
- Around 47% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4843 vs 3285
- Around 47% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4843 vs 3285
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 18 February 2014 vs 16 August 2012 |
Core clock speed | 1020 MHz vs 915 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1085 MHz vs 980 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 60 Watt vs 150 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 517 vs 466 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 42.463 vs 36.256 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 133.458 vs 82.191 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4843 vs 3285 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4843 vs 3285 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti
- 2.4x more texture fill rate: 102.5 billion / sec vs 43.4 GTexel / s
- 2.1x more pipelines: 1344 vs 640
- Around 77% better floating-point performance: 2,459.5 gflops vs 1,389 gflops
- Around 20% higher memory clock speed: 6.0 GB/s vs 5.4 GB/s
- Around 13% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 4411 vs 3898
- Around 33% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 15349 vs 11512
- Around 60% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1029.267 vs 642.715
- Around 4% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.037 vs 2.933
- Around 73% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 45.894 vs 26.532
- 13.9x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 1615 vs 116
Specifications (specs) | |
Texture fill rate | 102.5 billion / sec vs 43.4 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 1344 vs 640 |
Floating-point performance | 2,459.5 gflops vs 1,389 gflops |
Memory clock speed | 6.0 GB/s vs 5.4 GB/s |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 4411 vs 3898 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 15349 vs 11512 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1029.267 vs 642.715 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.037 vs 2.933 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 45.894 vs 26.532 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3684 vs 3683 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3337 vs 3329 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3684 vs 3683 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3337 vs 3329 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1615 vs 116 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3898 | 4411 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 517 | 466 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 11512 | 15349 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 42.463 | 36.256 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 642.715 | 1029.267 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.933 | 3.037 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 26.532 | 45.894 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 133.458 | 82.191 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4843 | 3285 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3683 | 3684 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3329 | 3337 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4843 | 3285 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3683 | 3684 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3329 | 3337 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 116 | 1615 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Maxwell | Kepler |
Code name | GM107 | GK104 |
Launch date | 18 February 2014 | 16 August 2012 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $149 | $299 |
Place in performance rating | 726 | 727 |
Price now | $299.01 | $321.99 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Value for money (0-100) | 15.02 | 17.34 |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1085 MHz | 980 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1020 MHz | 915 MHz |
CUDA cores | 640 | 1344 |
Floating-point performance | 1,389 gflops | 2,459.5 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 640 | 1344 |
Texture fill rate | 43.4 GTexel / s | 102.5 billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 60 Watt | 150 Watt |
Transistor count | 1,870 million | 3,540 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Audio input for HDMI | Internal | Internal |
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI, One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One mini... | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort, One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI... |
G-SYNC support | ||
HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | 2048x1536 |
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | PCI Express 3.0 |
Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | 4.376" (11.1 cm) |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 5.7" (14.5 cm) | 9.5" (24.1 cm) |
Supplementary power connectors | None | Two 6-pin |
SLI options | 3-way | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 86.4 GB / s | 144.2 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 192-bit GDDR5 |
Memory clock speed | 5.4 GB/s | 6.0 GB/s |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | 0 |
Technologies |
||
3D Gaming | ||
3D Vision | ||
3D Vision Live | ||
Adaptive VSync | ||
Blu Ray 3D | ||
CUDA | ||
FXAA | ||
GeForce Experience | ||
GPU Boost | ||
TXAA | ||
3D Blu-Ray | ||
SLI |