NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670 vs AMD Radeon HD 7870 GHz Edition
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670 and AMD Radeon HD 7870 GHz Edition videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 month(s) later
- Around 28% higher texture fill rate: 102.5 billion / sec vs 80 GTexel / s
- Around 5% higher pipelines: 1344 vs 1280
- Around 32% lower typical power consumption: 170 Watt vs 225 Watt
- Around 16% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 5345 vs 4604
- Around 2% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 971.208 vs 952.668
- Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 7038 vs 6821
- Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 7038 vs 6821
- Around 11% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 1839 vs 1651
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 10 May 2012 vs 5 March 2012 |
Texture fill rate | 102.5 billion / sec vs 80 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 1344 vs 1280 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 170 Watt vs 225 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 5345 vs 4604 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 971.208 vs 952.668 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 7038 vs 6821 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3361 vs 3358 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 7038 vs 6821 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3361 vs 3358 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1839 vs 1651 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 7870 GHz Edition
- Around 2% higher boost clock speed: 1000 MHz vs 980 MHz
- Around 4% better floating-point performance: 2,560 gflops vs 2,459.5 gflops
- 200x more memory clock speed: 1200 MHz vs 6.0 GB/s
- Around 9% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 586 vs 537
- 5x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 77430 vs 15511
- Around 33% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 55.446 vs 41.613
- Around 9% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 4.68 vs 4.281
- Around 60% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 64.456 vs 40.404
- 3.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 294.215 vs 86.208
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3716 vs 3686
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3716 vs 3686
Specifications (specs) | |
Boost clock speed | 1000 MHz vs 980 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 2,560 gflops vs 2,459.5 gflops |
Memory clock speed | 1200 MHz vs 6.0 GB/s |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 586 vs 537 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 77430 vs 15511 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 55.446 vs 41.613 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.68 vs 4.281 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 64.456 vs 40.404 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 294.215 vs 86.208 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3716 vs 3686 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3716 vs 3686 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 7870 GHz Edition
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670 | AMD Radeon HD 7870 GHz Edition |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 5345 | 4604 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 537 | 586 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 15511 | 77430 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 41.613 | 55.446 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 971.208 | 952.668 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.281 | 4.68 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 40.404 | 64.456 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 86.208 | 294.215 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 7038 | 6821 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3686 | 3716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3361 | 3358 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 7038 | 6821 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3686 | 3716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3361 | 3358 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1839 | 1651 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670 | AMD Radeon HD 7870 GHz Edition | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Kepler | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | GK104 | Pitcairn |
Launch date | 10 May 2012 | 5 March 2012 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $399 | $349 |
Place in performance rating | 554 | 463 |
Price now | $474.99 | |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Value for money (0-100) | 13.20 | |
Design | AMD Radeon HD 7000 Series | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 980 MHz | 1000 MHz |
Core clock speed | 980 MHz | |
CUDA cores | 1344 | |
Floating-point performance | 2,459.5 gflops | 2,560 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Maximum GPU temperature | 97 °C | |
Pipelines | 1344 | 1280 |
Texture fill rate | 102.5 billion / sec | 80 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 170 Watt | 225 Watt |
Transistor count | 3,540 million | 2,800 million |
Stream Processors | 1024 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
Display Connectors | One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI..., 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x mini-DisplayPort |
G-SYNC support | ||
HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Multi monitor support | ||
DisplayPort support | ||
Dual-link DVI support | ||
Eyefinity | ||
VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | PCIe 2.1 x16 |
Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 9.5" (24.1 cm) | 241 mm |
SLI options | 3-way | |
Supplementary power connectors | Two 6-pin | 2x 6-pin |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 11 |
OpenGL | 4.2 | 4.5 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 192.2 GB / s | 153.6 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 256-bit GDDR5 | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 6.0 GB/s | 1200 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
3D Blu-Ray | ||
3D Gaming | ||
3D Vision | ||
Adaptive VSync | ||
CUDA | ||
FXAA | ||
GPU Boost | ||
SLI | ||
TXAA | ||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
CrossFire | ||
FreeSync |