NVIDIA Quadro M4000M vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro M4000M and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro M4000M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 3 month(s) later
- Around 3% higher boost clock speed: 1013 MHz vs 980 MHz
- Around 1% better floating-point performance: 2,496 gflops vs 2,459.5 gflops
- Around 70% lower typical power consumption: 100 Watt vs 170 Watt
- 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
- 835.3x more memory clock speed: 5012 MHz vs 6.0 GB/s
- Around 15% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 6153 vs 5336
- Around 28% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 19918 vs 15511
- Around 95% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 81.104 vs 41.613
- Around 27% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1235.338 vs 971.208
- Around 44% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 6.157 vs 4.281
- Around 69% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 68.443 vs 40.404
- 2.9x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 251.464 vs 86.208
- Around 8% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 7602 vs 7038
- Around 8% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 7602 vs 7038
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 18 August 2015 vs 10 May 2012 |
| Boost clock speed | 1013 MHz vs 980 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 2,496 gflops vs 2,459.5 gflops |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 100 Watt vs 170 Watt |
| Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 2 GB |
| Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz vs 6.0 GB/s |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 6153 vs 5336 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 19918 vs 15511 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 81.104 vs 41.613 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1235.338 vs 971.208 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 6.157 vs 4.281 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 68.443 vs 40.404 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 251.464 vs 86.208 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 7602 vs 7038 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 7602 vs 7038 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670
- Around 1% higher core clock speed: 980 MHz vs 975 MHz
- Around 31% higher texture fill rate: 102.5 billion / sec vs 78 GTexel / s
- Around 5% higher pipelines: 1344 vs 1,280
- Around 30% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 535 vs 411
- Around 34% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3686 vs 2749
- Around 9% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3361 vs 3093
- Around 34% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3686 vs 2749
- Around 9% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3361 vs 3093
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 980 MHz vs 975 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 102.5 billion / sec vs 78 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 1344 vs 1,280 |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 535 vs 411 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3686 vs 2749 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3361 vs 3093 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3686 vs 2749 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3361 vs 3093 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro M4000M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA Quadro M4000M | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 6153 | 5336 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 411 | 535 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 19918 | 15511 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 81.104 | 41.613 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1235.338 | 971.208 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 6.157 | 4.281 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 68.443 | 40.404 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 251.464 | 86.208 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 7602 | 7038 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2749 | 3686 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3093 | 3361 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 7602 | 7038 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2749 | 3686 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3093 | 3361 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 | 1839 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA Quadro M4000M | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | Kepler |
| Code name | GM204 | GK104 |
| Launch date | 18 August 2015 | 10 May 2012 |
| Place in performance rating | 562 | 564 |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $399 | |
| Price now | $474.99 | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 13.20 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1013 MHz | 980 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 975 MHz | 980 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 2,496 gflops | 2,459.5 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 1,280 | 1344 |
| Texture fill rate | 78 GTexel / s | 102.5 billion / sec |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 100 Watt | 170 Watt |
| Transistor count | 5,200 million | 3,540 million |
| CUDA cores | 1344 | |
| Maximum GPU temperature | 97 °C | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI..., 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| Display Port | 1.2 | |
| Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
| G-SYNC support | ||
| HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | Two 6-pin |
| Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
| Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
| Length | 9.5" (24.1 cm) | |
| SLI options | 3-way | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.2 |
| Shader Model | 5.0 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 160 GB / s | 192.2 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256-bit GDDR5 |
| Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz | 6.0 GB/s |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Vision Pro | ||
| Mosaic | ||
| nView Display Management | ||
| Optimus | ||
| 3D Blu-Ray | ||
| 3D Gaming | ||
| 3D Vision | ||
| Adaptive VSync | ||
| CUDA | ||
| FXAA | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| SLI | ||
| TXAA | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA Quadro M4000M with others
NVIDIAQuadro M4000M vs
NVIDIAQuadro FX 540
NVIDIAQuadro M4000M vs
ATIMobility Radeon HD 4850
NVIDIAQuadro M4000M vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 670
NVIDIAQuadro M4000M vs
AMDRadeon R7 260
NVIDIAQuadro M4000M vs
NVIDIAQuadro P600
NVIDIAQuadro M4000M vs
NVIDIAP104-100
