NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670MX vs ATI Radeon X1600 XT

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670MX and ATI Radeon X1600 XT videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670MX

• Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 0 month(s) later
• Around 2% higher core clock speed: 600 MHz vs 590 MHz
• 20.3x more texture fill rate: 48.0 billion / sec vs 2.36 GTexel / s
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 90 nm
• 12x more maximum memory size: 3 GB vs 256 MB
• Around 1% higher memory clock speed: 1400 MHz vs 1380 MHz
• 16.9x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1965 vs 116
• Around 92% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3350 vs 1745
• Around 92% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3350 vs 1745

Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon X1600 XT

• Around 79% lower typical power consumption: 42 Watt vs 75 Watt
• Around 8% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 356 vs 329

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670MX
GPU 2: ATI Radeon X1600 XT

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	1965 116
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	329 356
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3350 1745
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3350 1745

Compare specifications (specs)