Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670MX
Comparative analysis of Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670MX videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, API support, Memory, Technologies, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645
- Videocard is newer: launch date 6 year(s) 9 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 5x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 75 Watt
- Around 5% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 6370 vs 6047
- Around 19% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 390 vs 329
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 10 July 2019 vs 1 October 2012 |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 75 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 6370 vs 6047 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 390 vs 329 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670MX
- 2x more core clock speed: 600 MHz vs 300 MHz
- 20x more pipelines: 960 vs 48
- Around 15% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1965 vs 1716
- 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3698 vs 1780
- 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3698 vs 1780
- Around 12% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3350 vs 2992
- Around 12% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3350 vs 2992
- Around 22% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3396 vs 2792
- Around 22% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3396 vs 2792
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 600 MHz vs 300 MHz |
Pipelines | 960 vs 48 |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1965 vs 1716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3698 vs 1780 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3698 vs 1780 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3350 vs 2992 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3350 vs 2992 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3396 vs 2792 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3396 vs 2792 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670MX
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
Name | Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670MX |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 6370 | 6047 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 390 | 329 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1716 | 1965 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1780 | 3698 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1780 | 3698 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2992 | 3350 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2992 | 3350 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2792 | 3396 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2792 | 3396 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 20.831 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670MX | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Intel Gen. 9.5 (Coffee Lake) | Kepler |
Code name | Kaby Lake GT3e | GK104 |
Launch date | 10 July 2019 | 1 October 2012 |
Place in performance rating | 816 | 819 |
Type | Laptop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1150 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 600 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 48 | 960 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 75 Watt |
CUDA cores | 960 | |
Floating-point performance | 1,154 gflops | |
Texture fill rate | 48.0 billion / sec | |
Transistor count | 3,540 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
DisplayPort support | ||
eDP 1.2 signal support | Yes | |
HDMI | ||
Display Connectors | No outputs | |
HDCP | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | Up to 2048x1536 | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 | 12 API |
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.5 | |
Memory |
||
Memory type | DDR3/DDR4 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | Yes | 0 |
Maximum RAM amount | 3 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 67.2 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 192 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 1400 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
H265/HEVC Decode | ||
Quick Sync | ||
3D Vision | ||
3D Vision / 3DTV Play | ||
Adaptive VSync | ||
CUDA | ||
DirectX 11 | DirectX 11 | |
FXAA | ||
SLI | ||
TXAA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCI Express 2.0 | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
Laptop size | large | |
SLI options | 2-way |