NVIDIA Quadro K510M vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670MX

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro K510M and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670MX videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

NVIDIA Quadro K510M

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670MX

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K510M

Videocard is newer: launch date 9 month(s) later
Around 41% higher core clock speed: 846 MHz vs 600 MHz
2.5x lower typical power consumption: 30 Watt vs 75 Watt
Around 71% higher memory clock speed: 2400 MHz vs 1400 MHz
Around 35% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 441 vs 326

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	23 July 2013 vs 1 October 2012
Core clock speed	846 MHz vs 600 MHz
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	30 Watt vs 75 Watt
Memory clock speed	2400 MHz vs 1400 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark	441 vs 326

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670MX

3.5x more texture fill rate: 48.0 billion / sec vs 13.54 GTexel / s
5x more pipelines: 960 vs 192
3.6x better floating-point performance: 1,154 gflops vs 324.9 gflops
3x more maximum memory size: 3 GB vs 1 GB
3x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1947 vs 641
3.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3396 vs 1087
3.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3396 vs 1087
Around 84% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3698 vs 2012
Around 84% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3698 vs 2012
Around 9% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3350 vs 3071
Around 9% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3350 vs 3071

Specifications (specs)
Texture fill rate	48.0 billion / sec vs 13.54 GTexel / s
Pipelines	960 vs 192
Floating-point performance	1,154 gflops vs 324.9 gflops
Maximum memory size	3 GB vs 1 GB
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	1947 vs 641
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	3396 vs 1087
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	3396 vs 1087
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3698 vs 2012
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3698 vs 2012
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3350 vs 3071
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3350 vs 3071

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro K510M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670MX

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

641

1947

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

441

326

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1087

3396

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1087

3396

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2012

3698

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2012

3698

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3071

3350

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3071

3350

Name	NVIDIA Quadro K510M	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670MX
PassMark - G3D Mark	641	1947
PassMark - G2D Mark	441	326
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	1087	3396
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	1087	3396
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	2012	3698
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	2012	3698
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3071	3350
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3071	3350
Geekbench - OpenCL		5980
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)		20.831
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score		0

Compare specifications (specs)

	NVIDIA Quadro K510M	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670MX
Essentials
Architecture	Kepler 2.0	Kepler
Code name	GK208	GK104
Launch date	23 July 2013	1 October 2012
Place in performance rating	835	818
Type	Mobile workstation	Laptop
Technical info
Core clock speed	846 MHz	600 MHz
Floating-point performance	324.9 gflops	1,154 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	28 nm
Pipelines	192	960
Texture fill rate	13.54 GTexel / s	48.0 billion / sec
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	30 Watt	75 Watt
Transistor count	1270 Million	3,540 million
CUDA cores		960
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs
Display Port	1.2
HDCP
HDMI
Maximum VGA resolution		Up to 2048x1536
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	MXM-A (3.0)	PCIe 3.0 x16
Laptop size	medium sized	large
Bus support		PCI Express 2.0
SLI options		2-way
API support
DirectX	12	12 API
OpenGL	4.5	4.5
Shader Model	5
Vulkan
OpenCL		1.1
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	1 GB	3 GB
Memory bandwidth	19.2 GB / s	67.2 GB / s
Memory bus width	64 Bit	192 Bit
Memory clock speed	2400 MHz	1400 MHz
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Shared memory	0	0
Technologies
3D Vision Pro
Mosaic
nView Display Management
Optimus
3D Vision
3D Vision / 3DTV Play
Adaptive VSync
CUDA
DirectX 11		DirectX 11
FXAA
SLI
TXAA