NVIDIA Quadro K510M vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670MX
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro K510M and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670MX videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K510M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 9 month(s) later
- Around 41% higher core clock speed: 846 MHz vs 600 MHz
- 2.5x lower typical power consumption: 30 Watt vs 75 Watt
- Around 71% higher memory clock speed: 2400 MHz vs 1400 MHz
- Around 34% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 441 vs 329
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 23 July 2013 vs 1 October 2012 |
| Core clock speed | 846 MHz vs 600 MHz |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt vs 75 Watt |
| Memory clock speed | 2400 MHz vs 1400 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 441 vs 329 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670MX
- 3.5x more texture fill rate: 48.0 billion / sec vs 13.54 GTexel / s
- 5x more pipelines: 960 vs 192
- 3.6x better floating-point performance: 1,154 gflops vs 324.9 gflops
- 3x more maximum memory size: 3 GB vs 1 GB
- 3.1x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1965 vs 641
- 3.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3396 vs 1087
- 3.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3396 vs 1087
- Around 84% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3698 vs 2012
- Around 84% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3698 vs 2012
- Around 9% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3350 vs 3071
- Around 9% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3350 vs 3071
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Texture fill rate | 48.0 billion / sec vs 13.54 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 960 vs 192 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,154 gflops vs 324.9 gflops |
| Maximum memory size | 3 GB vs 1 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1965 vs 641 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3396 vs 1087 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3396 vs 1087 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3698 vs 2012 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3698 vs 2012 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3350 vs 3071 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3350 vs 3071 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro K510M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670MX
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA Quadro K510M | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670MX |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 641 | 1965 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 441 | 329 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1087 | 3396 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1087 | 3396 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2012 | 3698 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2012 | 3698 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3071 | 3350 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3071 | 3350 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 6047 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 20.831 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA Quadro K510M | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670MX | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Kepler 2.0 | Kepler |
| Code name | GK208 | GK104 |
| Launch date | 23 July 2013 | 1 October 2012 |
| Place in performance rating | 818 | 819 |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
| Core clock speed | 846 MHz | 600 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 324.9 gflops | 1,154 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 192 | 960 |
| Texture fill rate | 13.54 GTexel / s | 48.0 billion / sec |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt | 75 Watt |
| Transistor count | 1270 Million | 3,540 million |
| CUDA cores | 960 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Display Port | 1.2 | |
| HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Maximum VGA resolution | Up to 2048x1536 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Laptop size | medium sized | large |
| Bus support | PCI Express 2.0 | |
| SLI options | 2-way | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 12 API |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
| Shader Model | 5 | |
| Vulkan | ||
| OpenCL | 1.1 | |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 3 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 19.2 GB / s | 67.2 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 192 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 2400 MHz | 1400 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Shared memory | 0 | 0 |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Vision Pro | ||
| Mosaic | ||
| nView Display Management | ||
| Optimus | ||
| 3D Vision | ||
| 3D Vision / 3DTV Play | ||
| Adaptive VSync | ||
| CUDA | ||
| DirectX 11 | DirectX 11 | |
| FXAA | ||
| SLI | ||
| TXAA | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA Quadro K510M with others
NVIDIAQuadro K510M vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 570 Rev. 2
NVIDIAQuadro K510M vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 560 Ti
NVIDIAQuadro K510M vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 670MX
NVIDIAQuadro K510M vs
AMDRadeon R5 235X OEM
NVIDIAQuadro K510M vs
IntelIris Plus Graphics 645
NVIDIAQuadro K510M vs
AMDRadeon Vega 9
