NVIDIA GeForce GTX 850A vs AMD FirePro W7000
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 850A and AMD FirePro W7000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 850A
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 9 month(s) later
- 7.8x lower typical power consumption: 45 Watt vs 350 Watt
- Around 1% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 551 vs 546
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 17 March 2014 vs 13 June 2012 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 45 Watt vs 350 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 551 vs 546 |
Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro W7000
- Around 5% higher core clock speed: 950 MHz vs 902 MHz
- 2x more texture fill rate: 76 GTexel / s vs 37.44 GTexel / s
- 2x more pipelines: 1280 vs 640
- 2x better floating-point performance: 2,432 gflops vs 1,198 gflops
- 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
- 2.7x more memory clock speed: 4800 MHz vs 1800 MHz
- 4.1x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 4288 vs 1050
- Around 68% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 6475 vs 3857
- Around 68% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 6475 vs 3857
- Around 26% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3714 vs 2957
- Around 26% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3714 vs 2957
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 950 MHz vs 902 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 76 GTexel / s vs 37.44 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 1280 vs 640 |
Floating-point performance | 2,432 gflops vs 1,198 gflops |
Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 2 GB |
Memory clock speed | 4800 MHz vs 1800 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 4288 vs 1050 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6475 vs 3857 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6475 vs 3857 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3714 vs 2957 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3714 vs 2957 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 vs 3351 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 vs 3351 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 850A
GPU 2: AMD FirePro W7000
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 850A | AMD FirePro W7000 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1050 | 4288 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 551 | 546 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3857 | 6475 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3857 | 6475 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2957 | 3714 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2957 | 3714 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3351 | 3359 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3351 | 3359 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 17771 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 52.467 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1148.367 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.886 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 85.472 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 268.49 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 850A | AMD FirePro W7000 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Maxwell | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | GM107 | Pitcairn |
Launch date | 17 March 2014 | 13 June 2012 |
Place in performance rating | 513 | 510 |
Type | Desktop | Workstation |
Launch price (MSRP) | $899 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 936 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 902 MHz | 950 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 1,198 gflops | 2,432 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 640 | 1280 |
Texture fill rate | 37.44 GTexel / s | 76 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 45 Watt | 350 Watt |
Transistor count | 1,870 million | 2,800 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 4x DisplayPort |
DisplayPort count | 4 | |
Dual-link DVI support | ||
StereoOutput3D | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Form factor | Full Height / Full Length | |
Length | 242 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12.0 (11_1) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 4 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 28.8 GB / s | 153.6 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | 4800 MHz |
Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR5 |