NVIDIA GeForce GTX 850A vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 850A and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 850A

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 9 month(s) later
  • 5.1x lower typical power consumption: 45 Watt vs 230 Watt
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 17 March 2014 vs 30 May 2013
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 45 Watt vs 230 Watt
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3351 vs 3340
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3351 vs 3340

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770

  • Around 16% higher core clock speed: 1046 MHz vs 902 MHz
  • Around 16% higher boost clock speed: 1085 MHz vs 936 MHz
  • 3.6x more texture fill rate: 134 billion / sec vs 37.44 GTexel / s
  • 2.4x more pipelines: 1536 vs 640
  • 2.8x better floating-point performance: 3,333 gflops vs 1,198 gflops
  • 3.9x more memory clock speed: 7012 MHz vs 1800 MHz
  • 5.7x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 5939 vs 1050
  • Around 2% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 562 vs 551
  • Around 92% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 7412 vs 3857
  • Around 92% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 7412 vs 3857
  • Around 25% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3690 vs 2957
  • Around 25% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3690 vs 2957
Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed 1046 MHz vs 902 MHz
Boost clock speed 1085 MHz vs 936 MHz
Texture fill rate 134 billion / sec vs 37.44 GTexel / s
Pipelines 1536 vs 640
Floating-point performance 3,333 gflops vs 1,198 gflops
Memory clock speed 7012 MHz vs 1800 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 5939 vs 1050
PassMark - G2D Mark 562 vs 551
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 7412 vs 3857
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 7412 vs 3857
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3690 vs 2957
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3690 vs 2957

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 850A
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
1050
5939
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
551
562
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3857
7412
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3857
7412
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2957
3690
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2957
3690
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3351
3340
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3351
3340
Name NVIDIA GeForce GTX 850A NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770
PassMark - G3D Mark 1050 5939
PassMark - G2D Mark 551 562
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 3857 7412
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 3857 7412
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 2957 3690
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 2957 3690
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3351 3340
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3351 3340
Geekbench - OpenCL 18068
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 49.824
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 1089.67
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 4.899
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 44.06
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 103.884
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 2155

Compare specifications (specs)

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 850A NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770

Essentials

Architecture Maxwell Kepler
Code name GM107 GK104
Launch date 17 March 2014 30 May 2013
Place in performance rating 518 515
Type Desktop Desktop
Launch price (MSRP) $399
Price now $449.99
Value for money (0-100) 15.45

Technical info

Boost clock speed 936 MHz 1085 MHz
Core clock speed 902 MHz 1046 MHz
Floating-point performance 1,198 gflops 3,333 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm 28 nm
Pipelines 640 1536
Texture fill rate 37.44 GTexel / s 134 billion / sec
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 45 Watt 230 Watt
Transistor count 1,870 million 3,540 million
CUDA cores 1536
Maximum GPU temperature 98 °C

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort, One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI...
Audio input for HDMI Internal
G-SYNC support
HDCP
HDMI
Maximum VGA resolution 2048x1536
Multi monitor support

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 3.0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus support PCI Express 3.0
Height 4.376" (11.1 cm)
Length 10.5" (26.7 cm)
Minimum recommended system power 600 Watt
Supplementary power connectors One 8-pin and one 6-pin

API support

DirectX 12.0 (11_0) 12.0 (11_0)
OpenGL 4.6 4.3

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 2 GB
Memory bandwidth 28.8 GB / s 224.3 GB / s
Memory bus width 128 Bit 256 Bit
Memory clock speed 1800 MHz 7012 MHz
Memory type DDR3 GDDR5

Technologies

3D Gaming
3D Vision
3D Vision Live
Adaptive VSync
Blu Ray 3D
CUDA
FXAA
GPU Boost
PhysX
TXAA