NVIDIA Quadro P1000 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 850A
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro P1000 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 850A videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P1000
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 10 month(s) later
- Around 40% higher core clock speed: 1266 MHz vs 902 MHz
- Around 58% higher boost clock speed: 1480 MHz vs 936 MHz
- Around 58% higher texture fill rate: 59.2 GTexel / s vs 37.44 GTexel / s
- Around 58% better floating-point performance: 1,894 gflops vs 1,198 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
- 2.8x more memory clock speed: 5012 MHz vs 1800 MHz
- 4.3x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 4500 vs 1050
- Around 7% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 590 vs 551
- Around 76% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 6796 vs 3857
- Around 25% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3702 vs 2957
- Around 76% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 6796 vs 3857
- Around 25% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3702 vs 2957
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 7 February 2017 vs 17 March 2014 |
| Core clock speed | 1266 MHz vs 902 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1480 MHz vs 936 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 59.2 GTexel / s vs 37.44 GTexel / s |
| Floating-point performance | 1,894 gflops vs 1,198 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
| Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 2 GB |
| Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz vs 1800 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 4500 vs 1050 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 590 vs 551 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6796 vs 3857 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3702 vs 2957 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6796 vs 3857 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3702 vs 2957 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 850A
- Around 25% higher pipelines: 640 vs 512
- Around 4% lower typical power consumption: 45 Watt vs 47 Watt
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Pipelines | 640 vs 512 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 45 Watt vs 47 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3351 vs 3348 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3351 vs 3348 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro P1000
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 850A
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA Quadro P1000 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 850A |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 4500 | 1050 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 590 | 551 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 15667 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 71.86 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 832.248 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.039 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 65.117 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 245.081 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6796 | 3857 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3702 | 2957 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3348 | 3351 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6796 | 3857 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3702 | 2957 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3348 | 3351 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1591 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA Quadro P1000 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 850A | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Pascal | Maxwell |
| Code name | GP107 | GM107 |
| Launch date | 7 February 2017 | 17 March 2014 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $375 | |
| Place in performance rating | 517 | 518 |
| Price now | $319.99 | |
| Type | Workstation | Desktop |
| Value for money (0-100) | 15.53 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1480 MHz | 936 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 1266 MHz | 902 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 1,894 gflops | 1,198 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 512 | 640 |
| Texture fill rate | 59.2 GTexel / s | 37.44 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 47 Watt | 45 Watt |
| Transistor count | 3,300 million | 1,870 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 4x mini-DisplayPort | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | 145 mm | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 80.19 GB / s | 28.8 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz | 1800 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3 |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA Quadro P1000 with others
NVIDIAQuadro P1000 vs
NVIDIAQuadro FX 370M
NVIDIAQuadro P1000 vs
AMDRadeon HD 7850
NVIDIAQuadro P1000 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 770
NVIDIAQuadro P1000 vs
NVIDIATesla K40c
NVIDIAQuadro P1000 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 850A
NVIDIAQuadro P1000 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 960
