NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 OEM vs NVIDIA Tesla K20c
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 OEM and NVIDIA Tesla K20c videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 OEM
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 0 month(s) later
- Around 67% higher core clock speed: 1176 MHz vs 706 MHz
- Around 35% higher memory clock speed: 7012 MHz vs 5200 MHz
- Around 95% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 76.687 vs 39.423
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 26 November 2015 vs 12 November 2012 |
Core clock speed | 1176 MHz vs 706 MHz |
Memory clock speed | 7012 MHz vs 5200 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 76.687 vs 39.423 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla K20c
- Around 91% higher texture fill rate: 146.8 GTexel / s vs 76.86 GTexel / s
- 2.4x more pipelines: 2496 vs 1024
- Around 43% better floating-point performance: 3,524 gflops vs 2,460 gflops
- Around 25% higher maximum memory size: 5 GB vs 4 GB
- Around 60% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1427.15 vs 890.785
- 2.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 64.383 vs 28.659
Specifications (specs) | |
Texture fill rate | 146.8 GTexel / s vs 76.86 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 2496 vs 1024 |
Floating-point performance | 3,524 gflops vs 2,460 gflops |
Maximum memory size | 5 GB vs 4 GB |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1427.15 vs 890.785 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 64.383 vs 28.659 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 OEM
GPU 2: NVIDIA Tesla K20c
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 OEM | NVIDIA Tesla K20c |
---|---|---|
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 76.687 | 39.423 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 890.785 | 1427.15 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 28.659 | 64.383 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 15597 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.128 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 179.044 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 OEM | NVIDIA Tesla K20c | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | Kepler |
Code name | GM206 | GK110 |
Launch date | 26 November 2015 | 12 November 2012 |
Place in performance rating | 1002 | 1005 |
Type | Desktop | Workstation |
Launch price (MSRP) | $3,199 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1201 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 1176 MHz | 706 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 2,460 gflops | 3,524 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 1024 | 2496 |
Texture fill rate | 76.86 GTexel / s | 146.8 GTexel / s |
Transistor count | 2,940 million | 7,080 million |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 225 Watt | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Length | 267 mm | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 5 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 112.2 GB / s | 208.0 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 320 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 7012 MHz | 5200 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |