NVIDIA Quadro P400 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 OEM
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro P400 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 OEM videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P400
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- Around 4% higher core clock speed: 1228 MHz vs 1176 MHz
- Around 4% higher boost clock speed: 1252 MHz vs 1201 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
Launch date | 7 February 2017 vs 26 November 2015 |
Core clock speed | 1228 MHz vs 1176 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1252 MHz vs 1201 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 OEM
- 3.6x more texture fill rate: 76.86 GTexel / s vs 21.25 GTexel / s
- 4x more pipelines: 1024 vs 256
- 3.6x better floating-point performance: 2,460 gflops vs 679.9 gflops
- 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
- Around 75% higher memory clock speed: 7012 MHz vs 4012 MHz
- 3.9x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 76.687 vs 19.856
- 2.9x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 890.785 vs 309.824
- Around 15% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 28.659 vs 25.011
Specifications (specs) | |
Texture fill rate | 76.86 GTexel / s vs 21.25 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 1024 vs 256 |
Floating-point performance | 2,460 gflops vs 679.9 gflops |
Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 2 GB |
Memory clock speed | 7012 MHz vs 4012 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 76.687 vs 19.856 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 890.785 vs 309.824 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 28.659 vs 25.011 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro P400
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 OEM
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Quadro P400 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 OEM |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1644 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 440 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 3053 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 19.856 | 76.687 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 309.824 | 890.785 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.38 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 25.011 | 28.659 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 84.489 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2709 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2875 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3328 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2709 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2875 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3328 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 617 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Quadro P400 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 OEM | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Pascal | Maxwell 2.0 |
Code name | GP107 | GM206 |
Launch date | 7 February 2017 | 26 November 2015 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $119.99 | |
Place in performance rating | 1000 | 1002 |
Price now | $119.99 | |
Type | Workstation | Desktop |
Value for money (0-100) | 18.70 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1252 MHz | 1201 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1228 MHz | 1176 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 679.9 gflops | 2,460 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 256 | 1024 |
Texture fill rate | 21.25 GTexel / s | 76.86 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt | |
Transistor count | 3,300 million | 2,940 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 3x mini-DisplayPort | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 145 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 4 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 32.1 GB / s | 112.2 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 4012 MHz | 7012 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |