NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 OEM vs AMD Radeon R9 M275
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 OEM and AMD Radeon R9 M275 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 OEM
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 9 month(s) later
- Around 31% higher core clock speed: 1176 MHz vs 900 MHz
- Around 30% higher boost clock speed: 1201 MHz vs 925 MHz
- 2.1x more texture fill rate: 76.86 GTexel / s vs 37 GTexel / s
- Around 60% higher pipelines: 1024 vs 640
- 2.1x better floating-point performance: 2,460 gflops vs 1,184 gflops
- 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
- Around 75% higher memory clock speed: 7012 MHz vs 4000 MHz
- 2.7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 76.687 vs 28.064
- 2.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 890.785 vs 313.463
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 26 November 2015 vs 28 January 2014 |
Core clock speed | 1176 MHz vs 900 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1201 MHz vs 925 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 76.86 GTexel / s vs 37 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 1024 vs 640 |
Floating-point performance | 2,460 gflops vs 1,184 gflops |
Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 2 GB |
Memory clock speed | 7012 MHz vs 4000 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 76.687 vs 28.064 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 890.785 vs 313.463 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 M275
- Around 20% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 34.381 vs 28.659
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 34.381 vs 28.659 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 OEM
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 M275
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 OEM | AMD Radeon R9 M275 |
---|---|---|
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 76.687 | 28.064 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 890.785 | 313.463 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 28.659 | 34.381 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1115 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 569 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 9231 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.206 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 121.685 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1162 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1717 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1162 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1717 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 OEM | AMD Radeon R9 M275 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | GM206 | Venus |
Launch date | 26 November 2015 | 28 January 2014 |
Place in performance rating | 1002 | 1004 |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $799.99 | |
Price now | $699.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 3.01 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1201 MHz | 925 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1176 MHz | 900 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 2,460 gflops | 1,184 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 1024 | 640 |
Texture fill rate | 76.86 GTexel / s | 37 GTexel / s |
Transistor count | 2,940 million | 1,500 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Laptop size | large | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_1) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 2 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 112.2 GB / s | 64 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 7012 MHz | 4000 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 |