NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960A vs ATI FireGL V8650

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960A and ATI FireGL V8650 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960A

• Videocard is newer: launch date 7 year(s) 9 month(s) later
• Around 50% higher core clock speed: 1029 MHz vs 688 MHz
• 3.9x more texture fill rate: 43.4 GTexel / s vs 11.01 GTexel / s
• 2x more pipelines: 640 vs 320
• 3.2x better floating-point performance: 1,389 gflops vs 440.3 gflops
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 80 nm
• 2.9x more memory clock speed: 5012 MHz vs 1736 MHz
• 4.4x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2411 vs 550
• 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 7859 vs 3357
• 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 7859 vs 3357

Reasons to consider the ATI FireGL V8650

• Around 1% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 637 vs 631

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960A
GPU 2: ATI FireGL V8650

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	2411 550
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	631 637
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	7859 3357
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	7859 3357

Compare specifications (specs)