AMD Radeon Pro 560X vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960A

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro 560X and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960A videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro 560X

• Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 4 month(s) later
• Around 60% higher pipelines: 1024 vs 640
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
• Around 1% higher memory clock speed: 5080 MHz vs 5012 MHz
• Around 6% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3678 vs 3465
• 2.3x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 711 vs 312
• Around 40% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 17535 vs 12495
• Around 8% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.96 vs 3.67
• Around 25% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 62.405 vs 49.875
• Around 38% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 247.728 vs 179.567
• Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 5367 vs 5157
• Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 5367 vs 5157

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960A

• Around 2% higher core clock speed: 1029 MHz vs 1004 MHz
• Around 3% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 49.772 vs 48.494
• Around 11% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 757.295 vs 679.583
• 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 5834 vs 2495
• 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 7859 vs 3351
• 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 5834 vs 2495
• 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 7859 vs 3351

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro 560X
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960A

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	3678 3465
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	711 312
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	17535 12495
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	48.494 49.772
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	679.583 757.295
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3.96 3.67
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	62.405 49.875
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	247.728 179.567
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	5367 5157
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2495 5834
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3351 7859
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	5367 5157
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2495 5834
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3351 7859

Compare specifications (specs)