NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960A
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960A videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 month(s) later
- Around 9% higher boost clock speed: 1188 MHz vs 1085 MHz
- Around 13% higher texture fill rate: 49.2 billion / sec vs 43.4 GTexel / s
- Around 20% higher pipelines: 768 vs 640
- Around 31% better floating-point performance: 1,825 gflops vs 1,389 gflops
- Around 54% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 5340 vs 3465
- 2.1x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 641 vs 312
- Around 34% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 16728 vs 12495
- Around 22% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 60.473 vs 49.772
- Around 17% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 4.279 vs 3.67
- Around 29% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 231.508 vs 179.567
- Around 32% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 6803 vs 5157
- Around 32% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 6803 vs 5157
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 20 August 2015 vs 13 March 2015 |
| Boost clock speed | 1188 MHz vs 1085 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 49.2 billion / sec vs 43.4 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 768 vs 640 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,825 gflops vs 1,389 gflops |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 5340 vs 3465 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 641 vs 312 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 16728 vs 12495 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 60.473 vs 49.772 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 758.865 vs 757.295 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.279 vs 3.67 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 231.508 vs 179.567 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6803 vs 5157 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6803 vs 5157 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960A
- Around 20% lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 90 Watt
- 835.3x more memory clock speed: 5012 MHz vs 6.6 GB/s
- Around 68% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 49.875 vs 29.738
- Around 58% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 5834 vs 3697
- 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 7859 vs 3356
- Around 58% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 5834 vs 3697
- 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 7859 vs 3356
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1029 MHz vs 1024 MHz |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt vs 90 Watt |
| Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz vs 6.6 GB/s |
| Benchmarks | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 49.875 vs 29.738 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 5834 vs 3697 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 7859 vs 3356 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 5834 vs 3697 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 7859 vs 3356 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960A
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960A |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 5340 | 3465 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 641 | 312 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 16728 | 12495 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 60.473 | 49.772 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 758.865 | 757.295 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.279 | 3.67 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 29.738 | 49.875 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 231.508 | 179.567 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6803 | 5157 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3697 | 5834 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 | 7859 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6803 | 5157 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3697 | 5834 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 | 7859 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 105 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960A | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | Maxwell |
| Code name | GM206 | GM107 |
| Launch date | 20 August 2015 | 13 March 2015 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $159 | |
| Place in performance rating | 547 | 548 |
| Price now | $194.44 | |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
| Value for money (0-100) | 30.06 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1188 MHz | 1085 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 1024 MHz | 1029 MHz |
| CUDA cores | 768 | |
| Floating-point performance | 1,825 gflops | 1,389 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 768 | 640 |
| Texture fill rate | 49.2 billion / sec | 43.4 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 90 Watt | 75 Watt |
| Transistor count | 2,940 million | 1,870 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, Dual Link DVI-I, HDMI 2.0, 3x DisplayPort 1.2 | No outputs |
| G-SYNC support | ||
| HDCP | ||
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
| Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
| Length | 7.938" (20.2 cm) | |
| Recommended system power (PSU) | 350 Watt | |
| SLI options | 2x | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pins | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 105.6 GB / s | 80.19 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 6.6 GB/s | 5012 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Vision | ||
| Adaptive Vertical Sync | ||
| CUDA | ||
| GameStream | ||
| GameWorks | ||
| GeForce Experience | ||
| GeForce ShadowPlay | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| SLI | ||
| Surround | ||

