NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M vs AMD Radeon HD 7870 GHz Edition
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M and AMD Radeon HD 7870 GHz Edition videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 7 month(s) later
- Around 13% higher boost clock speed: 1127 MHz vs 1000 MHz
- Around 20% higher pipelines: 1536 vs 1280
- 2.3x lower typical power consumption: 100 Watt vs 225 Watt
- 4x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 2 GB
- 2.1x more memory clock speed: 2500 MHz vs 1200 MHz
- Around 59% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 7356 vs 4617
- Around 67% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 92.634 vs 55.446
- Around 20% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1146.534 vs 952.668
- Around 45% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 6.776 vs 4.68
- Around 5% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 308.42 vs 294.215
- Around 55% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 10572 vs 6821
- Around 55% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 10572 vs 6821
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 7 October 2014 vs 5 March 2012 |
Boost clock speed | 1127 MHz vs 1000 MHz |
Pipelines | 1536 vs 1280 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 100 Watt vs 225 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 2 GB |
Memory clock speed | 2500 MHz vs 1200 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 7356 vs 4617 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 92.634 vs 55.446 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1146.534 vs 952.668 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 6.776 vs 4.68 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 308.42 vs 294.215 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 10572 vs 6821 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 10572 vs 6821 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 7870 GHz Edition
- Around 54% higher texture fill rate: 80 GTexel / s vs 51.84 GTexel / s
- Around 54% better floating-point performance: 2,560 gflops vs 1,659 gflops
- Around 20% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 591 vs 491
- 3.3x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 77430 vs 23820
- 3.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 64.456 vs 18.431
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3716 vs 3695
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3716 vs 3695
- 2.5x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 1651 vs 648
Specifications (specs) | |
Texture fill rate | 80 GTexel / s vs 51.84 GTexel / s |
Floating-point performance | 2,560 gflops vs 1,659 gflops |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 591 vs 491 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 77430 vs 23820 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 64.456 vs 18.431 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3716 vs 3695 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 vs 3342 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3716 vs 3695 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 vs 3342 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1651 vs 648 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 7870 GHz Edition
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M | AMD Radeon HD 7870 GHz Edition |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 7356 | 4617 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 491 | 591 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 23820 | 77430 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 92.634 | 55.446 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1146.534 | 952.668 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 6.776 | 4.68 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 18.431 | 64.456 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 308.42 | 294.215 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 10572 | 6821 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3695 | 3716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3342 | 3358 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 10572 | 6821 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3695 | 3716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3342 | 3358 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 648 | 1651 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M | AMD Radeon HD 7870 GHz Edition | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | GM204 | Pitcairn |
Launch date | 7 October 2014 | 5 March 2012 |
Place in performance rating | 471 | 472 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Design | AMD Radeon HD 7000 Series | |
Launch price (MSRP) | $349 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1127 MHz | 1000 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1038 MHz | |
CUDA cores | 1536 | |
Floating-point performance | 1,659 gflops | 2,560 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 1536 | 1280 |
Texture fill rate | 51.84 GTexel / s | 80 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 100 Watt | 225 Watt |
Transistor count | 5,200 million | 2,800 million |
Stream Processors | 1024 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x mini-DisplayPort |
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | 1 | |
G-SYNC support | ||
HDMI | ||
VGA аnalog display support | 1 | |
DisplayPort support | ||
Dual-link DVI support | ||
Eyefinity | ||
VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | PCIe 2.1 x16 |
Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Laptop size | large | |
SLI options | 1 | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 2x 6-pin |
Length | 241 mm | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 11 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 2 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 160 GB / s | 153.6 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 2500 MHz | 1200 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
Ansel | ||
BatteryBoost | ||
CUDA | ||
DSR | ||
GameStream | ||
GameWorks | ||
GeForce Experience | ||
GeForce ShadowPlay | ||
GPU Boost | ||
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | ||
Optimus | ||
SLI | ||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
CrossFire | ||
FreeSync |