NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN BLACK vs AMD Radeon HD 8830M
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN BLACK and AMD Radeon HD 8830M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN BLACK
- Videocard is newer: launch date 10 month(s) later
- Around 55% higher core clock speed: 889 MHz vs 575 MHz
- Around 70% higher boost clock speed: 980 MHz vs 575 MHz
- 8.5x more texture fill rate: 213 billion / sec vs 25 GTexel / s
- 4.5x more pipelines: 2880 vs 640
- 7.1x better floating-point performance: 5,645 gflops vs 800.0 gflops
- 3x more maximum memory size: 6 GB vs 2 GB
- 3.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 8721 vs 2695
- 3.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 8721 vs 2695
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 18 February 2014 vs 1 April 2013 |
Core clock speed | 889 MHz vs 575 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 980 MHz vs 575 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 213 billion / sec vs 25 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 2880 vs 640 |
Floating-point performance | 5,645 gflops vs 800.0 gflops |
Maximum memory size | 6 GB vs 2 GB |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 8721 vs 2695 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 8721 vs 2695 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 8830M
- 285.7x more memory clock speed: 2000 MHz vs 7.0 GB/s
- Around 39% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 5106 vs 3679
- 3.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 11302 vs 3353
- Around 39% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 5106 vs 3679
- 3.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 11302 vs 3353
Specifications (specs) | |
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz vs 7.0 GB/s |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 5106 vs 3679 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 11302 vs 3353 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 5106 vs 3679 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 11302 vs 3353 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN BLACK
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 8830M
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN BLACK | AMD Radeon HD 8830M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 9036 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 598 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 27085 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 72.677 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1293.474 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 7.988 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 22.384 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 290.861 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 8721 | 2695 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3679 | 5106 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3353 | 11302 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 8721 | 2695 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3679 | 5106 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3353 | 11302 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3095 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN BLACK | AMD Radeon HD 8830M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Kepler | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | GK110B | Venus |
Launch date | 18 February 2014 | 1 April 2013 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $999 | |
Place in performance rating | 444 | 445 |
Price now | $999.99 | |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Value for money (0-100) | 10.82 | |
Design | AMD Radeon HD 8000M Series | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 980 MHz | 575 MHz |
Core clock speed | 889 MHz | 575 MHz |
CUDA cores | 2880 | |
Floating-point performance | 5,645 gflops | 800.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 2880 | 640 |
Texture fill rate | 213 billion / sec | 25 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 250 Watt | |
Transistor count | 7,080 million | 1,500 million |
Compute units | 10 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort, One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI... | No outputs |
G-SYNC support | ||
HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 10.5" (26.7 cm) | |
Supplementary power connectors | One 8-pin and one 6-pin | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 11 |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.4 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | 2 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 336 GB / s | 32 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 384 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 7.0 GB/s | 2000 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Gaming | ||
3D Vision | ||
3D Vision Live | ||
Adaptive VSync | ||
Blu Ray 3D | ||
CUDA | ||
FXAA | ||
GPU Boost | ||
TXAA |