NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN BLACK vs ATI Radeon HD 2900 PRO

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN BLACK and ATI Radeon HD 2900 PRO videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN BLACK

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 6 year(s) 2 month(s) later
  • Around 48% higher core clock speed: 889 MHz vs 600 MHz
  • 22.2x more texture fill rate: 213 billion / sec vs 9.6 GTexel / s
  • 9x more pipelines: 2880 vs 320
  • 14.7x better floating-point performance: 5,645 gflops vs 384.0 gflops
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 80 nm
  • 12x more maximum memory size: 6 GB vs 512 MB
  • 14.4x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 9050 vs 628
  • Around 50% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 597 vs 397
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 18 February 2014 vs 12 December 2007
Core clock speed 889 MHz vs 600 MHz
Texture fill rate 213 billion / sec vs 9.6 GTexel / s
Pipelines 2880 vs 320
Floating-point performance 5,645 gflops vs 384.0 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm vs 80 nm
Maximum memory size 6 GB vs 512 MB
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 9050 vs 628
PassMark - G2D Mark 597 vs 397

Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon HD 2900 PRO

  • Around 25% lower typical power consumption: 200 Watt vs 250 Watt
  • 228.6x more memory clock speed: 1600 MHz vs 7.0 GB/s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 200 Watt vs 250 Watt
Memory clock speed 1600 MHz vs 7.0 GB/s

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN BLACK
GPU 2: ATI Radeon HD 2900 PRO

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
9050
628
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
597
397
Name NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN BLACK ATI Radeon HD 2900 PRO
PassMark - G3D Mark 9050 628
PassMark - G2D Mark 597 397
Geekbench - OpenCL 25674
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 72.677
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 1293.474
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 7.988
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 22.384
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 290.861
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 8721
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3679
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3353
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 8721
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3679
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3353
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 3095

Compare specifications (specs)

NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN BLACK ATI Radeon HD 2900 PRO

Essentials

Architecture Kepler TeraScale
Code name GK110B R600
Launch date 18 February 2014 12 December 2007
Launch price (MSRP) $999
Place in performance rating 441 379
Price now $999.99
Type Desktop Desktop
Value for money (0-100) 10.82

Technical info

Boost clock speed 980 MHz
Core clock speed 889 MHz 600 MHz
CUDA cores 2880
Floating-point performance 5,645 gflops 384.0 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm 80 nm
Pipelines 2880 320
Texture fill rate 213 billion / sec 9.6 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 250 Watt 200 Watt
Transistor count 7,080 million 720 million

Video outputs and ports

Audio input for HDMI Internal
Display Connectors 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort, One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI... 2x DVI, 1x S-Video
G-SYNC support
HDCP
HDMI
Maximum VGA resolution 2048x1536
Multi monitor support

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Bus support PCI Express 3.0
Height 4.376" (11.1 cm)
Interface PCIe 3.0 x16 PCIe 1.0 x16
Length 10.5" (26.7 cm) 241 mm
Supplementary power connectors One 8-pin and one 6-pin 1x 8-pin

API support

DirectX 12.0 (11_1) 10.0
OpenGL 4.4 3.3

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 6 GB 512 MB
Memory bandwidth 336 GB / s 118.4 GB / s
Memory bus width 384 Bit 512 Bit
Memory clock speed 7.0 GB/s 1600 MHz
Memory type GDDR5 GDDR4

Technologies

3D Gaming
3D Vision
3D Vision Live
Adaptive VSync
Blu Ray 3D
CUDA
FXAA
GPU Boost
TXAA