NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN BLACK vs AMD Radeon R9 270X
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN BLACK and AMD Radeon R9 270X videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN BLACK
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 month(s) later
- 2.5x more texture fill rate: 213 billion / sec vs 84 GTexel / s
- 2.3x more pipelines: 2880 vs 1280
- 2.1x better floating-point performance: 5,645 gflops vs 2,688 gflops
- 3x more maximum memory size: 6 GB vs 2 GB
- Around 84% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 8972 vs 4870
- Around 14% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 72.677 vs 63.87
- Around 26% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 7.988 vs 6.354
- Around 8% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 8721 vs 8068
- Around 8% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 8721 vs 8068
- Around 75% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 3095 vs 1772
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 18 February 2014 vs 8 October 2013 |
Texture fill rate | 213 billion / sec vs 84 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 2880 vs 1280 |
Floating-point performance | 5,645 gflops vs 2,688 gflops |
Maximum memory size | 6 GB vs 2 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 8972 vs 4870 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 72.677 vs 63.87 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 7.988 vs 6.354 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 8721 vs 8068 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3353 vs 3350 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 8721 vs 8068 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3353 vs 3350 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3095 vs 1772 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 270X
- Around 7% higher boost clock speed: 1050 MHz vs 980 MHz
- Around 39% lower typical power consumption: 180 Watt vs 250 Watt
- Around 4% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 613 vs 592
- Around 2% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1314.72 vs 1293.474
- 3.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 85.21 vs 22.384
- Around 8% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 315.412 vs 290.861
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3706 vs 3679
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3706 vs 3679
Specifications (specs) | |
Boost clock speed | 1050 MHz vs 980 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 180 Watt vs 250 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 613 vs 592 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1314.72 vs 1293.474 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 85.21 vs 22.384 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 315.412 vs 290.861 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3706 vs 3679 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3706 vs 3679 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN BLACK
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 270X
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN BLACK | AMD Radeon R9 270X |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 8972 | 4870 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 592 | 613 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 27012 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 72.677 | 63.87 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1293.474 | 1314.72 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 7.988 | 6.354 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 22.384 | 85.21 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 290.861 | 315.412 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 8721 | 8068 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3679 | 3706 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3353 | 3350 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 8721 | 8068 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3679 | 3706 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3353 | 3350 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3095 | 1772 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN BLACK | AMD Radeon R9 270X | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Kepler | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | GK110B | Curacao |
Launch date | 18 February 2014 | 8 October 2013 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $999 | $199 |
Place in performance rating | 452 | 453 |
Price now | $999.99 | $399 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Value for money (0-100) | 10.82 | 16.05 |
Design | AMD Radeon R9 200 Series | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 980 MHz | 1050 MHz |
Core clock speed | 889 MHz | |
CUDA cores | 2880 | |
Floating-point performance | 5,645 gflops | 2,688 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 2880 | 1280 |
Texture fill rate | 213 billion / sec | 84 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 250 Watt | 180 Watt |
Transistor count | 7,080 million | 2,800 million |
Stream Processors | 1280 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort, One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI... | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
G-SYNC support | ||
HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Multi monitor support | ||
DisplayPort support | ||
Dual-link DVI support | ||
Eyefinity | ||
VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 10.5" (26.7 cm) | |
Supplementary power connectors | One 8-pin and one 6-pin | 2 x 6-pin |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 12 |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.5 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | 2 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 336 GB / s | 179.2 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 384 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 7.0 GB/s | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Gaming | ||
3D Vision | ||
3D Vision Live | ||
Adaptive VSync | ||
Blu Ray 3D | ||
CUDA | ||
FXAA | ||
GPU Boost | ||
TXAA | ||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
AppAcceleration | ||
CrossFire | ||
DDMA audio | ||
FreeSync | ||
HD3D | ||
LiquidVR | ||
TressFX | ||
TrueAudio | ||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) |