NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN BLACK vs AMD Radeon R9 270X

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN BLACK and AMD Radeon R9 270X videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN BLACK

• Videocard is newer: launch date 4 month(s) later
• 2.5x more texture fill rate: 213 billion / sec vs 84 GTexel / s
• 2.3x more pipelines: 2880 vs 1280
• 2.1x better floating-point performance: 5,645 gflops vs 2,688 gflops
• 3x more maximum memory size: 6 GB vs 2 GB
• Around 84% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 8951 vs 4869
• Around 14% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 72.677 vs 63.87
• Around 26% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 7.988 vs 6.354
• Around 8% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 8721 vs 8068
• Around 8% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 8721 vs 8068
• Around 75% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 3095 vs 1772

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 270X

• Around 7% higher boost clock speed: 1050 MHz vs 980 MHz
• Around 39% lower typical power consumption: 180 Watt vs 250 Watt
• Around 4% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 613 vs 590
• Around 2% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1314.72 vs 1293.474
• 3.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 85.21 vs 22.384
• Around 8% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 315.412 vs 290.861
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3706 vs 3679
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3706 vs 3679

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN BLACK
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 270X

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	8951 4869
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	590 613
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	72.677 63.87
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1293.474 1314.72
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	7.988 6.354
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	22.384 85.21
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	290.861 315.412
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	8721 8068
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3679 3706
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3353 3350
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	8721 8068
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3679 3706
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3353 3350
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	3095 1772

Compare specifications (specs)